When molecules support morphology: Phylogenetic reconstruction of the family Onuphidae (Eunicida, Annelida) based on 16S rDNA and 18S rDNA

被引:20
作者
Budaeva, Nataliya [1 ,2 ]
Schepetov, Dmitry [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zanol, Joana [6 ]
Neretina, Tatiana [7 ,8 ]
Willassen, Endre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Museum Bergen, Nat Hist Collect, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway
[2] Russian Acad Sci, PP Shirshov Oceanol Inst, Moscow 117997, Russia
[3] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Evolutionary Genom Lab, Fac Bioengn & Bioinformat, Moscow 119991, Russia
[4] Koltzov Inst Dev Biol RAS, Moscow 119334, Russia
[5] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Moscow 101000, Russia
[6] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, BR-25250470 Duque De Caxias, RJ, Brazil
[7] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Fac Biol, White Sea Biol Stn, Moscow 119991, Russia
[8] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Moscow 117997, Russia
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
Systematics; Evolution; Hyalinoeciinae; Onuphinae; Quill worms; Beach worms; POLYCHAETA; EVOLUTION; DIVERSITY; SELECTION; CHOICE; GENUS; SEA; DNA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ympev.2015.10.011
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Onuphid polychaetes are tubicolous marine worms commonly reported worldwide from intertidal areas to hadal depths. They often dominate in benthic communities and have economic importance in aquaculture and recreational fishing. Here we report the phylogeny of the family Onuphidae based on the combined analyses of nuclear (18S rDNA) and mitochondrial (16S rDNA) genes. Results of Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood analyses supported the monophyly of Onuphidae and its traditional subdivision into two monophyletic subfamilies: Onuphinae and Hyalinoeciinae. Ten of 22 recognized genera were monophyletic with strong node support; four more genera included in this study were either monotypic or represented by a single species. None of the genera appeared para- or polyphyletic and this indicates a strong congruence between the traditional morphology-based systematics of the family and the newly obtained molecular-based phylogenetic reconstructions. Intergeneric relationships within Hyalinoeciinae were not resolved. Two strongly supported monophyletic groups of genera were recovered within Onuphinae: ((Onuphis, Aponuphis), Diopatra, Paradiopatra) and (Hirsutonuphis, (Paxtonia, (Kinbergonuphis, Mooreonuphis))). A previously accepted hypothesis on the subdivision of Onuphinae into the Onuphis group of genera and the Diopatra group of genera was largely rejected. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 801
页数:11
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques [J].
Aljanabi, SM ;
Martinez, I .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (22) :4692-4693
[2]  
Andrade Jose, 1993, Boletin del Instituto Oceanografico de Venezuela Universidad de Oriente, V32, P11
[3]  
Andrews E. A., 1891, Journal of Morphology, Vv, P113
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GENETIC ALGORITHM AP
[5]  
Audouin J V., 1833, Annales des Sciences Naturelles, V29, P195, DOI 10.5962/bhl.part.8010
[6]  
Augener H., 1918, Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna West- Afrikas, V2, P67, DOI DOI 10.5962/BHL.TITLE.7400
[7]   Make the most of your samples: Bayes factor estimators for high-dimensional models of sequence evolution [J].
Baele, Guy ;
Lemey, Philippe ;
Vansteelandt, Stijn .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 14
[9]  
Baird W., 1870, J LINNEAN SOC LONDON, V10, P341
[10]   Bayesian Tests of Topology Hypotheses with an Example from Diving Beetles [J].
Bergsten, Johannes ;
Nilsson, Anders N. ;
Ronquist, Fredrik .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (05) :660-673