DOES ECONOMIC GROWTH IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE?

被引:0
作者
Murgas, Frantisek [1 ]
Boehm, Hynek [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic
来源
ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION, VOL III | 2015年
关键词
quality of life; Easterlin's paradox; economic growth; golden standard quality of life;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
One of the directions in research of quality of life is examining the impact of economic growth on quality of life, which presents a fundamental axiological change in quality of life if this correlation is positive. In the classical approach, based on Easterlin's paradox, there is no correlation between economic growth, manifested by the growth in prosperity and growth of satisfaction of population with their lives. In contrary with this conception other scientists use correlations documented by the link between the growth of wealth and quality of life and refer to the Easterlin's paradox as to the Easterlin's illusion. We base verification of answers to the question raised in title of the article on statement that subjective dimension of quality of life (well-being) overweight's an objective dimension.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 219
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MEZINARODNI VZTAHY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators
[3]  
Commission of the European Communities, 2009, COM2009433 COMM EUR
[4]   Dark contrasts: The paradox of high rates of suicide in happy places [J].
Daly, Mary C. ;
Oswald, Andrew J. ;
Wilson, Daniel ;
Wu, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2011, 80 (03) :435-442
[5]   Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll [J].
Deaton, Angus .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 22 (02) :53-72
[6]  
DELHEY J., 2012, 2012201 WZB SPI
[7]  
Easterlin R.A., 2012, Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research, P113
[8]  
Frank RH, 2009, HAPPINESS, ECONOMICS AND POLITICS: TOWARDS A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH, P151
[9]  
HAMPL P., 2012, P METT PRIN ROZKV ME
[10]  
IVANOVA P., 2012, EKONOMICKA TEORIA EK, P1