On Deontology and Vocabulary of "Smysl"

被引:2
作者
Ryskeldiyeva, Lora T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vemadsky Crimean Fed Univ, 4 Vemadskogo Prospekt, Simferopol, Republic Of Cri, Russia
关键词
meaning; sense; deontology; practical philosophy; necessity; opportunity;
D O I
10.31857/S004287440005342-1
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The present article covers the search for language expressions that make it possible to have a speech that's adequate to solving the meaning of sense. The expression "There is sense in" reduces the sense to meanings, the expression "there is no sense in" only heightens the interest towards the search for it and "the sense can be" darkens the very problem of sense. The use of the words and expressions of "duty" in Russian language has some important specific features and gives an opportunity to formulate the problem of sense ("smysl") without reducing. The most accurate expression that describes specific aspects of sense as a metaphysical entity is "this should make sense", it transfers its being into the area of obligation and deontology is made into a unique area of responsibility for sense. Obligation provides correlation between Myself and the world, links everything that's outside me with what's inside me. The agenda of sense becomes the basics of philosophical deontology and within its framework the responsibilities of whoever thinks of the world can be found. This discovery happens in the process of answering two professional questions for a philosopher: What do I need to do to make sense? What do I have to do if it makes sense? These questions draw our attention to the genesis of sense within the different cultures and to the communicative (dialog) structure of the philosophical discourse.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 85
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Bentham J., 1834, DEONTOLOGY SCI MORAL
[2]  
Brassier R, 2007, NIHIL UNBOUND: ENLIGHTENMENT AND EXTINCTION, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230590823
[3]   MORALITY AS A SYSTEM OF HYPOTHETICAL IMPERATIVES [J].
FOOT, P .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1972, 81 (03) :305-316
[4]  
Ionesco Eugene, 2005, T AVENIR THEATRE LAB
[5]  
Kant I, 2006, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (B)
[6]  
Marcel Gabriel, 1995, POSITION APPROCHES C
[7]  
Nancy Jean-Luc., 1996, Etre singulier pluriel
[8]  
Nancy Jean-Luc, 2005, J CULTURAL RES, V9, DOI [10.1080/14797580500252621?journalCode=rcuv20, DOI 10.1080/14797580500252621?JOURNALCODE=RCUV20]
[9]  
Shakespeare William., 2005, Macbeth
[10]   The collective cognitive unconscious and its role in logic, language, and culture [J].
Smirnov, A. V. .
HERALD OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2017, 87 (05) :409-415