Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making-An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force

被引:401
作者
Thokala, Praveen [1 ]
Devlin, Nancy [2 ]
Marsh, Kevin [3 ]
Baltussen, Rob [4 ]
Boysen, Meindert [5 ]
Kalo, Zoltan [6 ,7 ]
Longrenn, Thomas [8 ,9 ]
Mussen, Filip [10 ]
Peacock, Stuart [11 ,12 ]
Watkins, John [13 ,14 ]
Ijzerman, Maarten [15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
[3] Evidera, London, England
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Natl Inst Hlth & Clin Excellence NICE, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Hlth Econ, Budapest, Hungary
[7] Syreon Res Inst, Budapest, Hungary
[8] NDA Grp AB, Budapest, Hungary
[9] NDA Grp AB, Upplands Vasby, Sweden
[10] Janssen Pharmaceut Companies Johnson & Johnson, Reg Regulatory Affairs, Antwerp, Belgium
[11] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Canadian Ctr Appl Res Canc Control ARCC, Vancouver, WA USA
[12] Simon Fraser Univ, Leslie Diamond Chairin Canc Survivorship, Vancouver, WA USA
[13] Premera Blue Cross, Formulary Dev, Bothell, WA USA
[14] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[15] Univ Twente, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, POB 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; SETTING PRIORITIES; CLASSIFICATION; INTERVENTIONS; REFLECTIONS; ALLOCATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Health care decisions are complex and involve confronting trade-offs between multiple, often conflicting, objectives. Using structured, explicit approaches to decisions involving multiple criteria can improve the quality of decision making and a set of techniques, known under the collective heading multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA), are useful for this purpose. MCDA methods are widely used in other sectors, and recently there has been an increase in health care applications. In 2014, ISPOR established an MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. It was charged with establishing a common definition for MCDA in health care decision making and developing good practice guidelines for conducting MCDA to aid health care decision making. This initial ISPOR MCDA task force report provides an introduction to MCDA - it defines MCDA; provides examples of its use in different kinds of decision making in health care (including benefit risk analysis, health technology assessment, resource allocation, portfolio decision analysis, shared patient clinician decision making and prioritizing patients' access to services); provides an overview of the principal methods of MCDA; and describes the key steps involved. Upon reviewing this report, readers should have a solid overview of MCDA methods and their potential for supporting health care decision making. Keywords: decision making, health care, MCDA, multiple criteria decision analysis. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Adunlin G., 2014, APPL MULTICRITERIA D
  • [2] STAR-People-Powered Prioritization: A 21st-Century Solution to Allocation Headaches
    Airoldi, Mara
    Morton, Alec
    Smith, Jenifer A. E.
    Bevan, Gwyn
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (08) : 965 - 975
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, USING DISCRETE CHOIC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, ISPOR 16 ANN EUR C 2
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, MULT AN MAN
  • [6] Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future
    Aouni, B
    Kettani, O
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 133 (02) : 225 - 231
  • [7] Priority setting of health interventions: The need for multi-criteria decision analysis
    Baltussen R.
    Niessen L.
    [J]. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 4 (1)
  • [8] Bana E Costa CA, 2005, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V78, P409, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_10
  • [9] Belton Valerie., 2002, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
  • [10] Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: Direct rating versus point allocation
    Bottomley, PA
    Doyle, JR
    Green, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (04) : 508 - 513