Technical details of the abdominal part during full robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy

被引：13

作者：

Berlth, Felix ^{[1
]}

Mann, Carolina ^{[1
]}

Uzun, Eren ^{[1
]}

Tagkalos, Evangelos ^{[1
]}

Hadzijusufovic, Edin ^{[1
]}

van Hillegersberg, Richard ^{[2
]}

Li, Hecheng ^{[3
]}

Egberts, Jan Hendrik ^{[4
]}

Lang, Hauke ^{[1
]}

Grimminger, Peter Philipp ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, Univ Med Ctr, Mainz, Germany

[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands

[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Dept Thorac Surg, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China

[4] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Gen Visceral Thorac Transplantat & Pediat Su, Kiel, Germany

来源：

DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS | 2020年 / 33卷

关键词：

abdominal part; da Vinci Xi; Ivor Lewis; RAMIE; robotic technique;

D O I：

10.1093/dote/doaa084

中图分类号：

R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The full robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is an upcoming approach in the treatment of esophageal and junctional cancer. Potential benefits are seen in angulated precise maneuvers in the abdominal part as well as in the thoracic part, but due to the novelty of this approach the optimal setting of the trocars, the instruments and the operating setting is still under debate. Hereafter, we present a technical description of the 'Mainz technique' of the abdominal part of RAMIE carried out as Ivor Lewis procedure. Postoperative complication rate and duration of the abdominal part of 100 consecutive patients from University Medical Center in Mainz are illustrated. In addition, the abdominal phase of the full RAMIE is discussed in general.

引用

页数：5

共 50 条

[1] Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy-technical considerations and outcomes
Scheese, Daniel
Ramamoorthy, Bhavishya U.
Bane, Ben
Puig, Carlos A.
Julliard, Walker A.
Shah, Rachit D.
ANNALS OF ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 7
[2] Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy
Horgan, S
Berger, RA
Elli, EF
Espat, NJ
AMERICAN SURGEON, 2003, 69 (07) : 624 - 626
[3] Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy
Kenneth Meredith
Paige Blinn
Taylor Maramara
Caitlin Takahashi
Jamie Huston
Ravi Shridhar
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 814 - 820
[4] Comparative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy
Meredith, K.
Huston, J.
Briceno, P.
Hoffe, S.
Almhanna, K.
Shridhar, R.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 : S179 - S180
[5] Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy
Meredith, Kenneth
Blinn, Paige
Maramara, Taylor
Takahashi, Caitlin
Huston, Jamie
Shridhar, Ravi
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02): : 814 - 820
[6] Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: is it advantageous over thoracoscopic esophagectomy?
Lin, Mong-Wei
Lee, Jang-Ming
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (03) : 490 - 491
[7] Learning Robotic-Assisted, Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Marathon, Not a Sprint
Servais, Elliot L.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (07) : 3887 - 3888
[8] Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy.
Meredith, Kenneth L.
Huston, Jamie
Shridhar, Ravi
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04)
[9] Learning Robotic-Assisted, Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Marathon, Not a Sprint
Elliot L. Servais
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 3887 - 3888
[10] Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy The Ivor Lewis Approach
Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
Rizk, Nabil P.
THORACIC SURGERY CLINICS, 2014, 24 (02) : 211 - +

← 1 2 3 4 5 →