Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons

被引:75
作者
Toman, Blaza [1 ]
Possolo, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Stat Engn Div, Informat Technol Lab, US Dept Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
关键词
Reference value; Consistent subset; Degrees of equivalence; Statistical model; Fixed effect; Random effects; Bias; KEY COMPARISON DATA; CONSISTENCY; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-009-0547-2
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The statistical analysis of results from inter-laboratory comparisons (for example Key Comparisons, or Supplemental Comparisons) produces an estimate of the measurand (reference value) and statements of equivalence of the results from the participating laboratories. Methods to estimate the reference value have been proposed that rest on the idea of finding a so-called consistent subset of laboratories, that is, eliminating allegedly outlying participants. We propose an alternative statistical model that accommodates all participant data and incorporates the dispersion of the measurement values obtained by different laboratories into the total uncertainty of the various estimates. This model recognizes the fact that the dispersion of values between laboratories often is substantially larger than the measurement uncertainties provided by the participating laboratories. We illustrate the methods on data from key comparison CCQM-K25.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 563
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MUT REC NAT MEAS STA
[2]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[3]  
*BIPM IEC IFCC ISO, 981995 BIPM IEC IFCC
[4]   Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biases [J].
Chunovkina, A. G. ;
Elster, C. ;
Lira, I. ;
Woeger, W. .
METROLOGIA, 2008, 45 (02) :211-216
[5]   The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset [J].
Cox, Maurice G. .
METROLOGIA, 2007, 44 (03) :187-200
[6]  
Cox MG, 2002, METROLOGIA, V39, P589, DOI 10.1088/0026-1394/39/6/10
[7]  
Davison A. C., 1997, Bootstrap methods and their application, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511802843
[8]   Recent recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Length (CCL) regarding strategies for evaluating key comparison data [J].
Decker, Jennifer E. ;
Brown, N. ;
Cox, Maurice G. ;
Steele, A. G. ;
Douglas, R. J. .
METROLOGIA, 2006, 43 (06) :L51-L55
[9]  
Hochberg Y., 1987, Multiple Comparison Procedures
[10]   Consistency tests for key comparison data [J].
Iyer, HK ;
Wang, CM ;
Vecchia, DF .
METROLOGIA, 2004, 41 (04) :223-230