A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications following immediate breast reconstruction

被引:51
作者
Varghese, Jajini [1 ,2 ]
Gohari, Shireen S. [3 ,4 ]
Rizki, Hirah [7 ]
Faheem, Michael [4 ]
Langridge, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Kummel, Sherko [5 ]
Johnson, Laura [4 ]
Schmid, Peter [6 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Royal Free Hosp, London, England
[2] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[3] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, London, England
[4] St Bartholomews Hosp, London, England
[5] Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
[6] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Expt Canc Med, Barts Canc Inst, London, England
[7] Royal Marsden Hosp, London, England
关键词
Immediate breast reconstruction; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Post-operative complications; Oncoplastic surgery; Plastic and reconstructive surgery; Breast surger; RISK-FACTORS; THERAPY; MASTECTOMY; CANCER; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on surgical outcomes following immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) remains unclear. While it is generally considered safe practice to perform an IBR post NACT, reported complication rates in published data are highly variable with the majority of studies including fewer than 50 patients in the NACT and IBR arm. To evaluate this further, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of NACT on autologous and implant based immediate breast reconstructions. We aimed to assess for differences in the post-operative course following IBR between patients who received NACT with those who did not. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from 1995 to Sept 2, 2020 to identify articles that assessed the impact of NACT on IBR. All included studies assessed outcomes following IBR. Only studies comparing reconstructed patients receiving NACT to a control group of women who did not receive NACT were included. Unadjusted relative risk of outcomes between patients who received or did not receive NACT were synthesized using a fixed-effect meta-analysis. The evidence was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale scores and GRADE. Primary effect measures were risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total 17 studies comprising 3249 patients were included in the meta-analyses. Overall, NACT did not increase the risk of complications after immediate breast reconstructions (risk ratio [RR]: 0.91, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.11, p = 0.34). There was a moderate, but not significant, increase in flap loss following NACT compared with controls (RR: 1.23, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.18, p = 0.47; I-2 = 0%). Most notably, there was a statistically significant increase in implant/expander loss after NACT (RR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.29, p = 0.03; I-2 = 34%). NACT was not shown to significantly increase the incidence of hematomas, seromas or wound complications, or result in a significant delay to commencing adjuvant therapy (RR: 1.59, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.87, p = 0.30). Conclusion: Immediate breast reconstruction after NACT is a safe procedure with an acceptable postoperative complication profile. It may result in a slight increase in implant loss rates, but it does not delay commencing adjuvant therapy. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Sully, L ;
Fallowfield, L ;
Blamey, RW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 26 (01) :17-19
[2]  
Alberro J, 2018, LONG TERM OUTCOMES N, V39
[3]   Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials [J].
Alberro, J. A. ;
Ballester, B. ;
Deulofeu, P. ;
Fabregas, R. ;
Fraile, M. ;
Gubern, J. M. ;
Janer, J. ;
Moral, A. ;
de Pablo, J. L. ;
Penalva, G. ;
Puig, P. ;
Ramos, M. ;
Rojo, R. ;
Santesteban, P. ;
Serra, C. ;
Sola, M. ;
Solarnau, L. ;
Solsona, J. ;
Veloso, E. ;
Vidal, S. ;
Abe, O. ;
Abe, R. ;
Enomoto, K. ;
Kikuchi, K. ;
Koyama, H. ;
Masuda, H. ;
Nomura, Y. ;
Ohashi, Y. ;
Sakai, K. ;
Sugimachi, K. ;
Toi, M. ;
Tominaga, T. ;
Uchino, J. ;
Yoshida, M. ;
Coles, C. E. ;
Haybittle, J. L. ;
Moebus, V. ;
Leonard, C. F. ;
Calais, G. ;
Garaud, P. ;
Collett, V. ;
Davies, C. ;
Delmestri, A. ;
Sayer, J. ;
Harvey, V. J. ;
Holdaway, I. M. ;
Kay, R. G. ;
Mason, B. H. ;
Forbe, J. F. ;
Franci, P. A. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (01) :27-39
[4]   Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A safe option? [J].
Allue Cabanuz, Marta ;
Arribas del Amo, Maria Dolores ;
Gil Romea, Ismael ;
Val-Carreres Rivera, Maria Pilar ;
Sousa Dominguez, Ramon ;
Guemes Sanchez, Antonio Tomas .
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2019, 97 (10) :575-581
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ANN SURG ONCOL
[6]   Influence of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Outcomes of Immediate Breast Reconstruction [J].
Azzawi, Khayam ;
Ismail, Amir ;
Earl, Helena ;
Forouhi, Parto ;
Malata, Charles M. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 126 (01) :1-11
[7]   The influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications of immediate DIEP flap breast reconstructions [J].
Beugels, J. ;
Meijvogel, J. L. W. ;
Tuinder, S. M. H. ;
Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. G. ;
Heuts, E. M. ;
Piatkowski, A. ;
van der Hulst, R. R. W. J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 176 (02) :367-375
[8]   Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on women undergoing breast cancer surgery and immediate breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and silicone implants [J].
D’Alessandro G.S. ;
Povedano A. ;
dos Santos L.K.I.L. ;
Munhoz A.M. ;
Gemperli R. ;
de Sampaio Góes J.C. .
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2017, 40 (4) :299-308
[9]  
Devereux DF, 1979, CANCER CYTOPATHOL, DOI [10.1002/1097-0142(197903)43:3932::AID-CNCR28204303223.0.CO
[10]  
2-A, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197903)43:3932::AID-CNCR28204303223.0.CO