A computable general equilibrium analysis of environmental tax reform in Japan with a forward-looking dynamic model

被引:29
作者
Takeda, Shiro [1 ]
Arimura, Toshi H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Sangyo Univ, Kita Ku, Kyoto 6038555, Japan
[2] Waseda Univ, Shinjuku Ku, 1-6-1 Nishiwaseda, Tokyo 1698050, Japan
关键词
Carbon tax; Environmental tax reform; Double dividend; Computable general equilibrium; Climate change; Tax interaction effects; Paris agreement;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-021-00903-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Japanese government plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050. However, it is not yet clear which policy measures the government will adopt to achieve this goal. In this regard, environmental tax reform, which is the combination of carbon regulation and the reduction of existing distortionary taxes, has attracted much attention. This paper examines the effects of an environmental tax reform in Japan. Using a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, we analyze the quantitative impacts of an environmental tax reform and clarify which types of environmental tax reform are the most desirable. In the simulation, we introduce a carbon tax and consider the following four scenarios for the use of the carbon tax revenue: (1) a lump-sum rebate to the household, (2) a cut in income taxes, (3) a cut in corporate taxes and (4) a cut in consumption taxes. The first scenario is a pure carbon tax, and the other three scenarios are types of environmental tax reform. Our CGE simulation shows that (1) environmental tax reform tends to generate more desirable impacts than the pure carbon tax and that (2) the strong double dividend is obtained in some cases. In particular, we show that a cut in corporate taxes leads to the most desirable policy in terms of GDP and national income.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 521
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Akimoto, 2017, J JPN SOC ENERGY RES, V38, P1, DOI 10.24778/jjser.38.1_1
[2]   The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction? [J].
Arimura, Toshi H. ;
Abe, Tatsuya .
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY STUDIES, 2021, 23 (03) :517-533
[3]   Political economy of voluntary approaches: A lesson from environmental policies in Japan [J].
Arimura, Toshi H. ;
Kaneko, Shinji ;
Managi, Shunsuke ;
Shinkuma, Takayoshi ;
Yamamoto, Masashi ;
Yoshida, Yuichiro .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2019, 64 :41-53
[4]  
ARMINGTON PS, 1969, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V16, P159
[5]   DESIGN OF TAX STRUCTURE - DIRECT VERSUS INDIRECT TAXATION [J].
ATKINSON, AB ;
STIGLITZ, JE .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1976, 6 (1-2) :55-75
[6]   Forward-looking versus recursive-dynamic modeling in climate policy analysis: A comparison [J].
Babiker, Mustafa ;
Gurgel, Angelo ;
Paltsev, Sergey ;
Reilly, John .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2009, 26 (06) :1341-1354
[7]   Global impacts of the Kyoto agreement: results from the MS-MRT model [J].
Bernstein, PM ;
Montgomery, WD ;
Rutherford, TF .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1999, 21 (3-4) :375-413
[8]  
Bovenberg A.L., 2002, Handbook of Public Economics, P1471, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80027-1
[9]   Consequences of environmental tax reform for unemployment and welfare [J].
Bovenberg, AL ;
Van der Ploeg, F .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 12 (02) :137-150
[10]  
Capros P., 2013, GEM-E3 Model Documentation