The NREL Biochemical and Thermochemical Ethanol Conversion Processes: Financial and Environmental Analysis Comparison

被引:0
作者
Daystar, Jesse [1 ]
Treasure, Trevor [1 ]
Gonzalez, Ronalds [1 ]
Reeb, Carter [1 ]
Venditti, Richard [1 ]
Kelley, Steve [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Forest Biomat, Coll Nat Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Biofuel; LCA; Environmental impacts; GHG; Conversion technology; Ethanol; Thermochemical; Biochemical; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION; CORN STOVER; GASIFICATION; RESIDUES; US; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.15376/biores.10.3.5083-5095
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS [轻工业、手工业、生活服务业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0822 ;
摘要
The financial and environmental performance of the National Renewable Energy Lab's (NREL) thermochemical and biochemical biofuel conversion processes are examined herein with pine, eucalyptus, unmanaged hardwood, switchgrass, and sweet sorghum. The environmental impacts of the process scenarios were determined by quantifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and TRACI impacts. Integrated financial and environmental performance metrics were introduced and used to examine the biofuel production scenarios. The thermochemical and biochemical conversion processes produced the highest financial performance and lowest environmental impacts when paired with pine and sweet sorghum, respectively. The high ash content of switchgrass and high lignin content of loblolly pine lowered conversion yields, resulting in the highest environmental impacts and lowest financial performance for the thermochemical and biochemical conversion processes, respectively. Biofuel produced using the thermochemical conversion process resulted in lower TRACI single score impacts and somewhat lower GHG emissions per megajoule (MJ) of fuel than using the biochemical conversion pathway. The cost of carbon mitigation resulting from biofuel production and corresponding government subsidies was determined to be higher than the expected market carbon price. In some scenarios, the cost of carbon mitigation was several times higher than the market carbon price, indicating that there may be other more cost-effective methods of reducing carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:5096 / 5116
页数:21
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways [J].
Anex, Robert P. ;
Aden, Andy ;
Kazi, Feroz Kabir ;
Fortman, Joshua ;
Swanson, Ryan M. ;
Wright, Mark M. ;
Satrio, Justinus A. ;
Brown, Robert C. ;
Daugaard, Daren E. ;
Platon, Alex ;
Kothandaraman, Geetha ;
Hsu, David D. ;
Dutta, Abhijit .
FUEL, 2010, 89 :S29-S35
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, KYOT PROT UN FRAM CO
[3]  
[Anonymous], NRELTP51037408 US DE
[4]  
[Anonymous], NRELTP51045913 US DE
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS N CAROLINA ST
[6]  
Balan V., 2012, Switchgrass: A Valuable Biomass Crop for Energy, P153, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4471-2903-5_7, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-2903-5_7]
[7]   Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: A review [J].
Balat, Mustafa .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (02) :858-875
[8]   TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 [J].
Bare, Jane .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2011, 13 (05) :687-696
[9]   Critical analysis of the mathematical relationships and comprehensiveness of life cycle impact assessment approaches [J].
Bare, JC ;
Gloria, TP .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (04) :1104-1113
[10]  
BARE JC, 2003, J IND ECOLOGY, V0006