Decrease in the incidence of mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in carriers from an intensive care unit

被引:10
作者
Caierao, J
Berquó, L
Dias, C
d'Azevedo, PA
机构
[1] Fdn Fac Fed Ciencias Med Porto Alegre, BR-90050170 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Hosp Mae de Deus, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.006
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious nosocomial problem, globally distributed. Decolonization with mupirocin can be used to control its dissemination. Objective: To determine the incidence of mupirocin resistance among MRSA carriers from an intensive care unit. Methods: We obtained 2723 nasal swabs during 3 years. Resistance to methicillin and mupirocin were verified (agar diffusion and the E test) and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (mecA for methicillin; ReS-2 and mupA for mupirocin). Plasmid-curing procedure and pulsed-held gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were employed in isolates exhibiting high resistance to mupirocin (HR-Mup) and in other selected organisms. Results: The overall incidence of HR-Mup among MRSA carriers during the studied period was 4.84% (8/165); however, the incidence decreased from 13.04% (6/46) in the first year to 3.5% (2/57) in the second year and was 0% in the last year (P = .02). LR-Mup, in contrast, increased significantly (P = .01). Conclusion: Plasmid-curing procedure showed the plasmid location of genes responsible for HR-Mup. PFGE demonstrated that most MRSA, including the isolates with HR-Mup, were genetically related, The decline in HR-Mup may be attributable to the plasmid location of genes (ileS-2/mupA) and to the fact that all patients colonized with HR-Mup MRSA died or were discharged in a relatively short period of time.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 9
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[21]   Mupirocin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:: Does mupirocin remain effective? [J].
Walker, ES ;
Vasquez, JE ;
Bullock, H ;
Sarubbi, FA .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 24 (05) :342-346