Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust

被引:0
作者
Evans, Anthony M. [1 ]
Krueger, Joachim I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Social Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Cognit Linguist & Psychol Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
来源
JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING | 2014年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
trust; reciprocity; social dilemmas; egocentrism; INTERPERSONAL-TRUST; NEGOTIATIONS; STRANGERS; BEHAVIOR; SYSTEM; SCALE; TIME;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Rational trust decisions depend on potential outcomes and expectations of reciprocity. In the trust game, outcomes and expectations correspond to the structural factors of risk and temptation. Two experiments investigated how risk and temptation influenced information search and final decisions in the trust game. The central finding was that trustors under-emphasized temptation relative to its effects on the expected value of trust. Instead, trustors made decisions egocentrically, focusing on potential outcomes. In Experiment 1, information search data revealed that trustors often made decisions without learning about the payoffs related to temptation. Experiment 2 investigated whether trustors were able to use temptation to form accurate expectations of reciprocity. Trustors understood, but underestimated, the relationship between temptation and the probability of reciprocity. Moreover, they did not fully consider expectations in their final trust decisions. Changes in potential outcomes had larger effects on trust than comparable changes in expectations. These results suggest that levels of trust are too high when the probability of reciprocity is low and too low when that probability is high.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 103
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Alicke M.D., 2010, Handbook of self-enhancement and selfprotection
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1993, ADAPTIVE DECISION MA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, SELF SOC JUDGM
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, Social judgment and decision-making
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2004, How the mind explains behavior. Folk explanation
  • [7] Trustworthiness is a social norm, but trusting is not
    Bicchieri, Cristina
    Xiao, Erte
    Muldoon, Ryan
    [J]. POLITICS PHILOSOPHY & ECONOMICS, 2011, 10 (02) : 170 - 187
  • [8] Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States
    Bohnet, Iris
    Greig, Fiona
    Herrmann, Benedikt
    Zeckhauser, Richard
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (01) : 294 - 310
  • [9] The Modular Nature of Trustworthiness Detection
    Bonnefon, Jean-Francois
    Hopfensitz, Astrid
    De Neys, Wim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2013, 142 (01) : 143 - 150
  • [10] Camerer C., 2003, Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction