Comparison of subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy vs percutaneous embolization in infertile men

被引:7
作者
Binhazzaa, M. [1 ]
Bounasr, E. [1 ]
Perez, G. [1 ]
Almont, T. [1 ]
Soulie, M. [1 ]
Faruch, M. [1 ]
Huyghe, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Toulouse, 1 Ave Jean Poulhes,TSA 50032, F-31059 Toulouse 9, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2016年 / 26卷 / 16期
关键词
Varicocele; Spermogram; Subinguinal varicocelectomy; Percutaneous embolization; Mate infertility; Interventional radiology; SEMEN PARAMETERS; METAANALYSIS; IMPROVEMENT; GUIDELINES; LIGATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2016.09.064
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction. - Subinguinal microscopic ligation is the current standard of treatment of varicocele, and percutaneous embolization is a new alternative. We aimed to compare these procedures for reproductive and functional aspects. Material. - A consecutive series of 76 patients with clinical varicocele, alteration of semen parameters and infertility, undergoing either procedure (microsurgery in 49 cases and embolization in 27 cases) was prospectively analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively (at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months). Outcome measures were: semen parameters, pregnancies, pain, side effects, recovery time and overall satisfaction. Subsequently, all patients were contacted by telephone in January 2015 (with a median delay of 4 years after the procedure) in order to determine reproductive events. Results. - Preoperatively, both groups were identical for clinical and biological items. We observed an improvement of sperm concentration at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (P< 0.001, < 0.001, 0.012, 0.018, respectively) and sperm motility at 6 months (P= 0.002). The sperm concentration was higher at 6 months in PE group (P= 0.043). With a median follow-up of 4 years after the procedure, 27 pregnancies occurred (spontaneous pregnancy rate of 32%). There was no difference between procedures on the sperm quality, pregnancy rate and the overall satisfaction. Patients undergoing percutaneous embolization reported a faster recovery time (P= 0.002) and less postoperative pain (P=0.007). Conclusion. - Both procedures give equivalent results regarding sperm quality, pregnancy rate and satisfaction even though recovery seems faster and postoperative pain seems lower after percutaneous embolization. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1184
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Does Varicocele Repair Improve Male Infertility? An Evidence-Based Perspective From a Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Abdel-Meguid, Taha A. ;
Al-Sayyad, Ahmad ;
Tayib, Abdulmalik ;
Farsi, Hasan M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (03) :455-461
[2]   Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: New meta-analytical approach [J].
Agarwal, Ashok ;
Deepinder, Fnu ;
Cocuzza, Marcello ;
Agarwal, Rishi ;
Short, Robert A. ;
Sabanegh, Edmund ;
Marmar, Joel L. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (03) :532-538
[3]   Time for Improvement in Semen Parameters After Varicocelectomy [J].
Al Bakri, Ayman ;
Lo, Kirk ;
Grober, Ethan ;
Cassidy, Darby ;
Cardoso, Joao Paulo ;
Jarvi, Keith .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (01) :227-231
[4]   Varicocele and Male Factor Infertility Treatment: A New Meta-analysis and Review of the Role of Varicocele Repair [J].
Baazeem, Abdulaziz ;
Belzile, Eric ;
Ciampi, Antonio ;
Dohle, Gert ;
Jarvi, Keith ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Weidner, Wolfgang ;
Zini, Armand .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (04) :796-808
[5]   Percutaneous Treatment of Varicocele with Microcoil Embolization: Comparison of Treatment Outcome with Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy [J].
Bechara, Carlos F. ;
Weakley, Sarah M. ;
Kougias, Panagiotis ;
Athamneh, Husam ;
Duffy, Patrick ;
Khera, Mohit ;
Kobayashi, Katsuhiro ;
Lin, Peter H. .
VASCULAR, 2009, 17 :S129-S136
[6]   Varicocele surgery or embolization: Which is better? [J].
Cassidy, Darby ;
Jarvi, Keith ;
Grober, Ethan ;
Lo, Kirk .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2012, 6 (04) :266-268
[7]   Treatment of Palpable Varicocele in Infertile Men: A Meta-analysis to Define the Best Technique [J].
Cayan, Selahittin ;
Shavakhabov, Shavkat ;
Kadioglu, Ates .
JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 30 (01) :33-40
[8]  
Cooper TG, 2010, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V16, P559, DOI [10.1093/humupd/dmq020, 10.1093/humupd/dmp048]
[9]  
DEWIRE DM, 1994, J ANDROL, V15, pS38
[10]   Review of current varicocelectomy techniques and their outcomes [J].
Diegidio, Paul ;
Jhaveri, Jay K. ;
Ghannam, Suzanne ;
Pinkhasov, Ruben ;
Shabsigh, Ridwan ;
Fisch, Harry .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (07) :1157-1172