A bridge for two views: Checkland's soft systems methodology and Maturana's ontology of the observer

被引:13
作者
Paucar-Caceres, Alberto [1 ]
Jerardino-Wiesenborn, Bruno [2 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Santiago Chile, Dept Ingn Informat, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Problem structuring; dialogue between two approaches; soft systems methodology; ontology of the observer; methodology enhancing; MULTIMETHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2019.1578629
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Checkland and Maturana's work aim to understand and to improve problematic situations in organisations and in our everyday life. Maturana's phenomenological onto-epistemology (we are immersed in the praxis of living in an ontological multi-universe) seems to resonate with Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) interpretivist epistemology. We argue that this concurrence makes it possible to reflect and explore some of Maturana's ideas (structural determinism/structural coupling/organisational closure) when they are grafted into the phases of the Checkland's SSM seven-step process. This article aims to complement SSM by proposing a framework in which some key concepts from Maturana's Ontology of the Observer (OoO) might enhance and expand the understanding of the SSM application process. An enriched and enhanced SSM process could have significant consequences in the Management Science/Operational Research (MS/OR) and Systems community practice. The framework proposed can have major social repercussions since it will incorporate the well-known influential OoO ideas into MS/OR practice.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 672
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MULTIMETHODOLOGY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, BIOL COGNITION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY
[4]   USING SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS IN HRM [J].
BROCKLESBY, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 1995, 16 (5-6) :70-&
[5]   The use of the concept autopoiesis in the theory of viable systems [J].
Brocklesby, J ;
Mingers, J .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2005, 22 (01) :3-9
[6]  
Brocklesby J. H., COMMUNICATION
[7]   The theoretical underpinnings of soft systems methodology - Comparing the work of geoffrey vickers and humberto maturana [J].
Brocklesby, John .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2007, 24 (02) :157-168
[8]  
Checkland P, 1997, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V14, P153, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199705/06)14:3<153::AID-SRES134>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-H
[10]  
Checkland P., 2006, Learning for Action: a Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its Use for Practitioner, Teachers, and Students