Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies

被引:49
|
作者
Harrington, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Wheeler, Graham M. [3 ]
Sweeting, Michael J. [3 ]
Mander, Adrian P. [3 ]
Jodrell, Duncan I. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Li Ka Shing Ctr, Canc Res UK Cambridge Inst, Cambridge CB2 0RE, England
[3] Inst Publ Hlth, MRC, Biostat Unit Hub Trials Methodol Res, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; CLINICAL-TRIAL DESIGN; LATE-ONSET TOXICITIES; DRUG-COMBINATIONS; FINDING DESIGN; COPULA REGRESSION; ORDINAL TOXICITY; ONCOLOGY TRIALS; CANCER; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.35
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Anticancer agents used in combination are fundamental to successful cancer treatment, particularly in a curative setting. For dual-agent phase I trials, the goal is to identify drug doses and schedules for further clinical testing. However, current methods for establishing the recommended phase II dose for agents in combination can fail to fully explore drug interactions. With increasing numbers of anticancer drugs requiring testing, new adaptive model-based trial designs that improve on current practice have been proposed, although uptake has been minimal. We describe the methods available and discuss some of the opportunities and challenges faced in dual-agent phase I trials, as well as giving examples of trials in which adaptive designs have been implemented successfully. Improving the design and execution of phase I trials of drug combinations critically relies on collaboration between the statistical and clinical communities to facilitate the implementation of adaptive, model-based designs.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 288
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies
    Jennifer A. Harrington
    Graham M. Wheeler
    Michael J. Sweeting
    Adrian P. Mander
    Duncan I. Jodrell
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2013, 10 : 277 - 288
  • [2] A novel Bayesian method for dual-agent Phase I dose-escalation studies using penalized D-optimality
    Graham Wheeler
    Trials, 14 (Suppl 1)
  • [3] A comparison of model-free phase I dose escalation designs for dual-agent combination therapies
    Barnett, Helen
    George, Matthew
    Skanji, Donia
    Saint-Hilary, Gaelle
    Jaki, Thomas
    Mozgunov, Pavel
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (02) : 203 - 226
  • [4] A practical design for a dual-agent dose-escalation trial that incorporates pharmacokinetic data
    Cotterill, Amy
    Lorand, Daniel
    Wang, Jixian
    Jaki, Thomas
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (13) : 2138 - 2164
  • [5] A product of independent beta probabilities dose escalation design for dual-agent phase I trials
    Mander, Adrian P.
    Sweeting, Michael J.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (08) : 1261 - 1276
  • [6] Bayesian Adaptive Dose-escalation Designs in Practice
    Wandel, S.
    Neuenschwander, B.
    Bailey, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S206 - S207
  • [7] Backfilling cohorts in phase I dose-escalation studies
    Barnett, Helen
    Boix, Oliver
    Kontos, Dimitris
    Jaki, Thomas
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2023, 20 (03) : 261 - 268
  • [8] The construction of optimal designs for dose-escalation studies
    Linda M. Haines
    Allan E. Clark
    Statistics and Computing, 2014, 24 : 101 - 109
  • [9] The construction of optimal designs for dose-escalation studies
    Haines, Linda M.
    Clark, Allan E.
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2014, 24 (01) : 101 - 109
  • [10] AAA: triple adaptive Bayesian designs for the identification of optimal dose combinations in dual-agent dose finding trials
    Lyu, Jiaying
    Ji, Yuan
    Zhao, Naiqing
    Catenacci, Daniel V. T.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2019, 68 (02) : 385 - 410