Adjacent Level Degeneration Bryan Total Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

被引:17
|
作者
Miller, Justin [1 ]
Sasso, Rick [1 ]
Anderson, Paul [2 ]
Riew, K. Daniel [3 ]
McPhilamy, Austin [4 ]
Gianaris, Thomas [5 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Spine Grp, Carmel, IN 46032 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[4] Bay St Orthoped, Petoskey, MI USA
[5] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2018年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
Bryan Cervical Disc; ACDF; adjacent level degeneration; prospective; randomized; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; SEGMENT DISEASE; FOLLOW-UP; TRIAL; DECOMPRESSION; RADICULOPATHY; METAANALYSIS; REPLACEMENT; MULTICENTER; SPINE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000598
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Prospective randomized, 2-center, clinical trial. Objective: To prospectively compare adjacent level degeneration between the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and assess the reliability of our measurements utilizing a method not previously described. Summary of Background Data: ACDF is a reliable and proven procedure for the treatment of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Despite a successful track record several limitations including adjacent segment degeneration/disease, loss of viscoelastic disc properties, perioperative immobilization, graft site morbidity, pseudarthrosis, and plating complications have been identified. An original driving force and theoretical basis for total disc arthroplasty was prevention of adjacent level degeneration. Materials and Methods: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled and followed prospectively at 2 centers in a multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial for the Bryan Cervical Disc arthroplasty. Neutral lateral radiographs were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively, and at 1-, 2-, 4-, and out to 7-year follow-up after surgery. The cephalad, adjacent level above the blinded procedure level was analyzed for all patients and time points by measuring the anteroposterior distance and the vertical disc height. A ratio was created using disc height/anteroposterior distance. Results: Seventy patients (Bryan Cervical Disc N=34 and ACDF N=36) met inclusion criteria. Both fusion and arthroplasty groups showed a significant (P=0.001) decrease in disc height over time, indicative of adjacent level degeneration. Overall change in disc height between groups was not significantly different. Using our measurement technique, the overall interreviewer reliability was good [intrareviewer correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval)=0.77 (0.55-0.85)] and intrareviewer reliability was excellent [0.93 (0.91-0.94) and 0.85 (0.81-0.87)]. Conclusions: Adjacent level degeneration occurs in a similar manner in both the ACDF and total disc arthroplasty group. Our measurement technique is reliable and to the best of our knowledge not previously reported in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:E98 / E101
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Primary cervical disc arthroplasty versus cervical disc arthroplasty adjacent to previous fusion A retrospective study with 48 months of follow-up
    Wu, Ting-kui
    Meng, Yang
    Liu, Hao
    Hong, Ying
    Wang, Bei-yu
    Rong, Xin
    Ding, Chen
    Chen, Hua
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (36)
  • [32] A meta-analysis comparing total disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative diseases
    Yao, Qiang
    Liang, Feng
    Xia, Yang
    Jia, Changqing
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2016, 136 (03) : 297 - 304
  • [33] Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study
    Gornet, Matthew F.
    Burkus, J. Kenneth
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Argires, Perry J.
    Nian, Hui
    Harrell, Frank E., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 23 (05) : 558 - 573
  • [34] CORR Insights®: Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis
    Albert, Todd J.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (05) : 1317 - 1318
  • [35] A meta-analysis of cervical arthroplasty compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level cervical disc disease
    Xing, Dan
    Ma, Xin-Long
    Ma, Jian-Xiong
    Wang, Jie
    Ma, Tao
    Chen, Yang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (07) : 970 - 978
  • [36] Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Incidence of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhu, Yuhang
    Zhang, Boyin
    Liu, Haochuan
    Wu, Yuntao
    Zhu, Qingsan
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (19) : 1493 - 1502
  • [37] Spondylolisthesis adjacent to a cervical disc arthroplasty does not increase the risk of adjacent level degeneration
    Kieser, David Christopher
    Cawley, Derek Thomas
    Roscop, Cecile
    Mazas, Simon
    Coudert, Pierre
    Boissiere, Louis
    Obeid, Ibrahim
    Vital, Jean-Marc
    Pointillart, Vincent
    Gille, Olivier
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (06) : 1440 - 1446
  • [38] Rate of Adjacent Segment Degeneration of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Fusion Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Luo, Jiaquan
    Wang, Hongbo
    Peng, Jun
    Deng, Zhongyuan
    Zhang, Zhen
    Liu, Shixue
    Wang, Daidong
    Gong, Ming
    Tang, Shuo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 113 : 225 - 231
  • [39] Cervical disc arthroplasty vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-what are the outcomes?
    Torrez, Timothy
    Dong, Willie
    Philippi, Matthew
    Percin, Brittany
    Connelly, James W.
    Drain, Joseph P.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    AME MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 9
  • [40] Adjacent Segment Pathology After Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Part 2: Clinical Results at 7-Year Follow-Up
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Kerr, Eubulus J., III
    Cavanaugh, David A.
    Utter, Phillip Andrew
    Campbell, Peter G.
    Wadhwa, Rishi
    Frank, Kelly A.
    Marshall, Kyle E.
    Stone, Marcus B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (03): : 278 - 285