Adjacent Level Degeneration Bryan Total Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

被引:16
作者
Miller, Justin [1 ]
Sasso, Rick [1 ]
Anderson, Paul [2 ]
Riew, K. Daniel [3 ]
McPhilamy, Austin [4 ]
Gianaris, Thomas [5 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Spine Grp, Carmel, IN 46032 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[4] Bay St Orthoped, Petoskey, MI USA
[5] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2018年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
Bryan Cervical Disc; ACDF; adjacent level degeneration; prospective; randomized; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; SEGMENT DISEASE; FOLLOW-UP; TRIAL; DECOMPRESSION; RADICULOPATHY; METAANALYSIS; REPLACEMENT; MULTICENTER; SPINE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000598
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Prospective randomized, 2-center, clinical trial. Objective: To prospectively compare adjacent level degeneration between the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and assess the reliability of our measurements utilizing a method not previously described. Summary of Background Data: ACDF is a reliable and proven procedure for the treatment of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Despite a successful track record several limitations including adjacent segment degeneration/disease, loss of viscoelastic disc properties, perioperative immobilization, graft site morbidity, pseudarthrosis, and plating complications have been identified. An original driving force and theoretical basis for total disc arthroplasty was prevention of adjacent level degeneration. Materials and Methods: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled and followed prospectively at 2 centers in a multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial for the Bryan Cervical Disc arthroplasty. Neutral lateral radiographs were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively, and at 1-, 2-, 4-, and out to 7-year follow-up after surgery. The cephalad, adjacent level above the blinded procedure level was analyzed for all patients and time points by measuring the anteroposterior distance and the vertical disc height. A ratio was created using disc height/anteroposterior distance. Results: Seventy patients (Bryan Cervical Disc N=34 and ACDF N=36) met inclusion criteria. Both fusion and arthroplasty groups showed a significant (P=0.001) decrease in disc height over time, indicative of adjacent level degeneration. Overall change in disc height between groups was not significantly different. Using our measurement technique, the overall interreviewer reliability was good [intrareviewer correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval)=0.77 (0.55-0.85)] and intrareviewer reliability was excellent [0.93 (0.91-0.94) and 0.85 (0.81-0.87)]. Conclusions: Adjacent level degeneration occurs in a similar manner in both the ACDF and total disc arthroplasty group. Our measurement technique is reliable and to the best of our knowledge not previously reported in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:E98 / E101
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis [J].
Anderson, Paul A. ;
Sasso, Rick C. ;
Riew, K. Daniel .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (12) :1305-1312
[2]   Kinematics of the Cervical Adjacent Segments After Disc Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Discectomy and Fusion A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Anderson, Paul A. ;
Sasso, Rick C. ;
Hipp, John ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Raich, Annie ;
Hashimoto, Robin .
SPINE, 2012, 37 (22) :S85-S95
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SPINE J, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SPINEE.2004.07.026
[4]   ROBINSON ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY AND ARTHRODESIS FOR CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF 100 AND 22 PATIENTS [J].
BOHLMAN, HH ;
EMERY, SE ;
GOODFELLOW, DB ;
JONES, PK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (09) :1298-1307
[5]   Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion [J].
Eck, JC ;
Humphreys, SC ;
Lim, TH ;
Jeong, ST ;
Kim, JG ;
Hodges, SD ;
An, HS .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (22) :2431-2434
[6]   A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis [J].
Fuller, DA ;
Kirkpatrick, JS ;
Emery, SE ;
Wilber, RG ;
Davy, DT .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (15) :1649-1656
[7]   Clinical Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Site Trial With 48-Month Follow-up [J].
Garrido, Ben J. ;
Taha, Tarek A. ;
Sasso, Rick C. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2010, 23 (06) :367-371
[8]   Adjacent Segment Pathology Following Cervical Motion-Sparing Procedures or Devices Compared With Fusion Surgery A Systematic Review [J].
Harrod, Christopher Chambliss ;
Hilibrand, Alan S. ;
Fischer, Dena J. ;
Skelly, Andrea C. .
SPINE, 2012, 37 (22) :S96-S112
[9]   Comparison of BRYAN Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Clinical and Radiographic Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial [J].
Heller, John G. ;
Sasso, Rick C. ;
Papadopoulos, Stephen M. ;
Anderson, Paul A. ;
Fessler, Richard G. ;
Hacker, Robert J. ;
Coric, Domagoj ;
Cauthen, Joseph C. ;
Riew, Daniel K. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (02) :101-107
[10]  
Hilibrand Alan S, 2004, Spine J, V4, p190S, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007