Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer patients with overall biopsy Gleason score 3+4=7 and highest Gleason score 3+4=7 or >3+4=7

被引:15
作者
Verhoef, Esther I. [1 ]
Kweldam, Charlotte F. [1 ]
Kuemmerlin, Intan P. [1 ]
Nieboer, Daan [2 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [3 ]
Incrocci, Luca [4 ]
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. [5 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [3 ]
van Leenders, Geert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Pathol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Lab Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
biopsy; Gleason score; highest; outcome; overall; prostate cancer; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CRIBRIFORM; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/his.13427
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
AimProstate cancer heterogeneity and multifocality might result in different Gleason scores (GS) at individual biopsy cores. According to World Health Organisation/International Society of Urologic Pathology (WHO/ISUP) guidelines, the GS in each biopsy core should be recorded with optional reporting of overall GS for the entire case. We aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and outcome of men with overall biopsy GS 3+4=7 with highest GS 3+4=7 (HI=OV) to those with highest GS>3+4=7 (HI>OV). Methods and resultsProstate cancer biopsies from the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) were revised according to WHO/ISUP 2014 guidelines (n=1031). In total, 370 patients had overall GS 3+4=7, 60 of whom (16%) had had at least one biopsy core with GS 4+3=7 or 4+4=8. Men with higher GS than 3+4 (HI>OV) in any of the cores had higher age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, number of positive biopsies, percentage tumour involvement, percentage Gleason grade 4 and cribriform or intraductal growth (all P<0.05) than those with GS 3+4=7 at highest (HI=OV). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, including PSA, percentage positive biopsies and percentage tumour involvement, biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy (P=0.52) or radiotherapy (P=0.35) was not statistically different between both groups. ConclusionAmong patients with overall GS 3+4=7, those with highest GS>3+4=7 had worse clinicopathological features, but clinical outcome was not statistically significant. Therefore, the use of overall GS instead of highest GS for clinical decision-making is justified, potentially preventing overtreatment in prostate cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:760 / 765
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Impact of Prostate Cancer Multifocality on Its Biology and Treatment [J].
Algaba, Ferran ;
Montironi, Rodolfo .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (05) :799-804
[2]   Multifocal prostate cancer: biologic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications [J].
Andreoiu, Matei ;
Cheng, Liang .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 41 (06) :781-793
[3]   EAU guidelines on prostate cancer [J].
Aus, G ;
Abbou, CC ;
Bolla, M ;
Heidenreich, A ;
Schmid, HP ;
van Poppel, H ;
Wolff, J ;
Zattoni, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (04) :546-551
[4]   Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome [J].
Berney, Daniel M. ;
Beltran, Luis ;
Fisher, Gabrielle ;
North, Bernard V. ;
Greenberg, David ;
Moller, Henrik ;
Soosay, Geraldine ;
Scardino, Peter ;
Cuzick, Jack .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 114 (10) :1078-1083
[5]   Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement [J].
Chen, Ronald C. ;
Rumble, R. Bryan ;
Loblaw, D. Andrew ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Ehdaie, Behfar ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Morgan, Scott C. ;
Tyldesley, Scott ;
Haluschak, John J. ;
Tan, Winston ;
Justman, Stewart ;
Jain, Suneil .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (18) :2182-+
[6]   Determining the cause of death in randomized screening trial(s) for prostate cancer [J].
De Koning, HJ ;
Blom, J ;
Merkelbach, JW ;
Raaijmakers, R ;
Verhaegen, H ;
Van Vliet, P ;
Nelen, V ;
Coebergh, JWW ;
Hermans, A ;
Ciatto, S ;
Mäkinen, T .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 :71-78
[7]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[8]   Should each core with prostate cancer be assigned a separate Gleason score? [J].
Kunz, GM ;
Epstein, JI .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2003, 34 (09) :911-914
[9]   Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma [J].
Kweldam, Charlotte F. ;
Kummerlin, Intan P. ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Verhoef, Esther I. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Incrocci, Luca ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
van Leenders, Geert J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 66 :26-33
[10]   Disease-specific survival of patients with invasive cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer at diagnostic biopsy [J].
Kweldam, Charlotte F. ;
Kummerlin, Intan P. ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Verhoef, Esther I. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
van Leenders, Geert J. .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 29 (06) :630-636