Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment

被引:29
作者
Rassiah, Prema [1 ]
Su, Fan-Chi Frances [1 ]
Huang, Y. Jessica [1 ]
Spitznagel, Dan [2 ]
Sarkar, Vikren [1 ]
Szegedi, Martin W. [1 ]
Zhao, Hui [1 ]
Paxton, Adam B. [1 ]
Nelson, Geoff [1 ]
Salter, Bill J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Radiat Oncol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Avera Canc Inst, Sioux Falls, SD USA
关键词
FMEA; initial plan check; quality assurance; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; THERAPY; ERRORS; RISK; IMPLEMENTATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12918
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To apply failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to generate an effective and efficient initial physics plan checklist. Methods A team of physicists, dosimetrists, and therapists was setup to reconstruct the workflow processes involved in the generation of a treatment plan beginning from simulation. The team then identified possible failure modes in each of the processes. For each failure mode, the severity (S), frequency of occurrence (O), and the probability of detection (D) was assigned a value and the risk priority number (RPN) was calculated. The values assigned were based on TG 100. Prior to assigning a value, the team discussed the values in the scoring system to minimize randomness in scoring. A local database of errors was used to help guide the scoring of frequency. Results Twenty-seven process steps and 50 possible failure modes were identified starting from simulation to the final approved plan ready for treatment at the machine. Any failure mode that scored an average RPN value of 20 or greater was deemed "eligible" to be placed on the second checklist. In addition, any failure mode with a severity score value of 4 or greater was also considered for inclusion in the checklist. As a by-product of this procedure, safety improvement methods such as automation and standardization of certain processes (e.g., dose constraint checking, check tools), removal of manual transcription of treatment-related information as well as staff education were implemented, although this was not the team's original objective. Prior to the implementation of the new FMEA-based checklist, an in-service for all the second checkers was organized to ensure further standardization of the process. Conclusion The FMEA proved to be a valuable tool for identifying vulnerabilities in our workflow and processes in generating a treatment plan and subsequently a new, more effective initial plan checklist was created.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ACR, 2015, ACR TECHN STAND PERF
[2]   A framework for automated contour quality assurance in radiation therapy including adaptive techniques [J].
Altman, M. B. ;
Kavanaugh, J. A. ;
Wooten, H. O. ;
Green, O. L. ;
DeWees, T. A. ;
Gay, H. ;
Thorstad, W. L. ;
Li, H. ;
Mutic, S. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (13) :5199-5209
[3]   Spinal surgery complications: an unsolved problem-Is the World Health Organization Safety Surgical Checklist an useful tool to reduce them? [J].
Barbanti-Brodano, Giovanni ;
Griffoni, Cristiana ;
Halme, Jarkko ;
Tedesco, Giuseppe ;
Terzi, Silvia ;
Bandiera, Stefano ;
Ghermandi, Riccardo ;
Evangelisti, Gisberto ;
Girolami, Marco ;
Pipola, Valerio ;
Gasbarrini, Alessandro ;
Falavigna, Asdrubal .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (05) :927-936
[4]  
de los Santos LEF, 2015, J APPL CLIN MED PHYS, V16, P37, DOI 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5431
[5]   AutoLock: a semiautomated system for radiotherapy treatment plan quality control [J].
Dewhurst, Joseph M. ;
Lowe, Matthew ;
Hardy, Mark J. ;
Boylan, Christopher J. ;
Whitehurst, Philip ;
Rowbottom, Carl G. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (03) :339-350
[6]   Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275 [J].
Ford, Eric ;
Conroy, Leigh ;
Dong, Lei ;
de los Santos, Luis Fong ;
Greener, Anne ;
Kim, Grace Gwe-Ya ;
Johnson, Jennifer ;
Johnson, Perry ;
Mechalakos, James G. ;
Napolitano, Brian ;
Parker, Stephanie ;
Schofield, Deborah ;
Smith, Koren ;
Yorke, Ellen ;
Wells, Michelle .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) :E236-E254
[7]   Quality Control Quantification (QCQ): A Tool to Measure the Value of Quality Control Checks in Radiation Oncology [J].
Ford, Eric C. ;
Terezakis, Stephanie ;
Souranis, Annette ;
Harris, Kendra ;
Gay, Hiram ;
Mutic, Sasa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03) :E263-E269
[8]   HOW SAFE IS SAFE? RISK IN RADIOTHERAPY [J].
Ford, Eric C. ;
Terezakis, Stephanie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (02) :321-322
[9]   EVALUATION OF SAFETY IN A RADIATION ONCOLOGY SETTING USING FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS [J].
Ford, Eric C. ;
Gaudette, Ray ;
Myers, Lee ;
Vanderver, Bruce ;
Engineer, Lilly ;
Zellars, Richard ;
Song, Danny Y. ;
Wong, John ;
DeWeese, Theodore L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03) :852-858
[10]   The impact of treatment complexity and computer-control delivery technology on treatment delivery errors [J].
Fraass, BA ;
Lash, KL ;
Matrone, GM ;
Volkman, SK ;
McShan, DL ;
Kessler, ML ;
Lichter, AS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (03) :651-659