Co-Production Under the Financial Crisis and Austerity: A Means of Democratizing Public Services or a Race to the Bottom?

被引:29
作者
Fotaki, Marianna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Business Eth, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
co-production; public services; financial crisis; austerity; alternative organizing; PARTICIPATION; ENGAGEMENT; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1177/1056492615579790
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The involvement of users in the co-production of public services is of increasing importance as fiscal and financial crises put pressure on public spending in many countries around the world. The role of co-production in public policy is also important as it creates opportunities for users' empowerment through their greater involvement in the key aspects of services on which they rely. However, there are practical and conceptual limitations to co-production. Citizens normally lack the training and experience to perform specialized services, and the substitution of paid personnel with voluntary efforts means that some of the costs are transferred to co-producers themselves . Co-production and users taking over public services under the financial crisis and austerity, might usher in a new era of democratizing public services or instigate a race to the bottom. This short article highlights the need for broadening and deepening our knowledge of the various forms of co-production, in order to understand the conditions for potentially transformative effects of co-production on the participants and policy environment. In conclusion, I argue that examining the new emerging forms of co-production, including those that promote different social goals and alternative ways of organizing, might provide an answer to questions about the future of public services.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 438
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Alford J, 2009, ENGAGING PUBLIC SECTOR CLIENTS: FROM SERVICE-DELIVERY TO CO-PRODUCTION, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230235816
[2]   Why do public-sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory [J].
Alford, J .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2002, 34 (01) :32-56
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Democracy realized: The progressive alternative
[5]  
Baker J., 2010, COPRODUCTION LOCAL S
[6]  
Bauwens M., 2012, PEER PRODUCTION PUBL, P34
[7]   Client co-production in knowledge-intensive business services [J].
Bettencourt, LA ;
Ostrom, AL ;
Brown, SW ;
Roundtree, RI .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 44 (04) :100-+
[8]  
Botero A., 2012, Towards Peer-Production in Public Services: Cases from Finland
[9]   Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services [J].
Bovaird, Tony .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2007, 67 (05) :846-860
[10]  
Boyle D., 2009, CHALLENGE COPRODUCTI