Australia's ethical framework for when animals are used for scientific purposes

被引:3
|
作者
Rose, M. [1 ,2 ]
Grant, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Hosp, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Natl Hlth & Med Res Council, Anim Welf Comm, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
animal research; animal welfare; ethical framework; ethics committees; public participation; research governance; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; BEHAVIORAL STRESS; COMMON MARMOSETS; COMMITTEES;
D O I
10.7120/09627286.22.3.315
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The basic tenet of the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (the Code) is that there is an ethical imperative in our decisions as to if and how animals are used in these circumstances. The Code provides a framework for ethical review which incorporates a set of guiding principles and establishes institutional Animal Ethics Committees with responsibilities for oversight of these activities; the nexus between animal welfare and scientific outcomes and the recognition that such ethical decisions are not matters for the scientific community alone but must involve the wider community are notions central to the effective implementation of the Code. The Code identifies the responsibilities of the parties involved such that arrangements within which individuals exercise their responsibilities are clarified and processes for accountability are transparent. First published in 1969 as an initiative of the scientific community under the auspices of the National Health and Medical Research Council, the seventh edition of the Code was published in 2004. The Code is a living document with changing community views and scientific developments reflected in each revision. The time course of the development of the Code provides a background to examine the way in which policies governing the use of animals for scientific purposes have evolved in Australia. This paper will provide an overview of these developments and discuss the influences which have shaped the key elements of this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 322
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Directive 86/609/EEC on the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes
    Louhimies, S
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2002, 30 : 217 - 219
  • [2] European Union Legislation for the Welfare of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes: Areas Identified for Further Discussion
    Marinou, Katerina A.
    Dontas, Ismene A.
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (14):
  • [3] Developments in the collection of statistical information on the number of animals used in experiments and other scientific purposes in the European Union
    Sauer, UG
    Kolar, R
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2000, 28 (01): : 133 - 145
  • [4] Importance of Welfare and Ethics Competence Regarding Animals Kept for Scientific Purposes to Veterinary Students in Australia and New Zealand
    Collins, Teresa
    Cornish, Amelia
    Hood, Jennifer
    Degeling, Chris
    Fisher, Andrew D.
    Freire, Rafael
    Hazel, Susan J.
    Johnson, Jane
    Lloyd, Janice K. F.
    Phillips, Clive J.
    Tzioumis, Vicky
    McGreevy, Paul D.
    VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (03)
  • [5] Revised tables for the collection of statistical information on the number of animals used in experiments and other scientific purposes in the European Union
    Sauer, UG
    Kolar, R
    Rusche, B
    ALTEX-ALTERNATIVEN ZU TIEREXPERIMENTEN, 1998, 15 (03): : 144 - 146
  • [6] A proposal for a new ethical scheme addressing the use of laboratory animals for biomedical purposes
    Delpire, VC
    Ben Mepham, T
    Balls, M
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 1999, 27 : 869 - 881
  • [7] Brexit: A Boon or a Curse for Animals Used in Scientific Procedures?
    Dunn, Rachel
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [8] Ethical and welfare considerations when using cephalopods as experimental animals
    Moltschaniwskyj, N. A.
    Hall, K.
    Marian, J. E. A. R.
    Nishiguchi, M.
    Sakai, M.
    Shulman, D. J.
    Sinclair, B.
    Sinn, D. L.
    Staudinger, M.
    Van Gelderen, R.
    Villanueva, R.
    Warnke, K.
    REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 2007, 17 (2-3) : 455 - 476
  • [9] Ethical and welfare considerations when using cephalopods as experimental animals
    N. A. Moltschaniwskyj
    K. Hall
    Marek R. Lipinski
    J. E. A. R. Marian
    M. Nishiguchi
    M. Sakai
    D. J. Shulman
    B. Sinclair
    D. L. Sinn
    M. Staudinger
    R. Van Gelderen
    R. Villanueva
    K. Warnke
    Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2007, 17 : 455 - 476
  • [10] Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission related to "Aspects of the biology and welfare of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes" EFSA-Q-2004-105 Adopted by the AHAW Panel on 14 November 2005
    Algers, Bo
    Blokhuis, Harry J.
    Broom, Donald Maurice
    Capua, Ilaria
    Cinotti, Stefano
    Gunn, Michael
    Hartung, Joerg
    Have, Per
    Vilanova, Xavier Manteca
    Morton, David B.
    Pepin, Michel
    Pfeiffer, Dirk Udo
    Roberts, Ronald John
    Sanchez Vizcaino, Jose Manuel
    Schudel, Alejandro
    Sharp, James Michael
    Theodoropoulos, Georgios
    Vannier, Philippe
    Verga, Marina
    Wierup, Martin
    Wooldridge, Marion
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2005, 3 (12):