Germany Going 'Midstream': Balancing vs Leadership in EU-NATO Cooperation

被引:3
作者
Ewers-Peters, Nele Marianne [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Adv Int Studies, ProgrammeThe Us Europe & World Order, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Univ Kent, Global Europe Ctr, Canterbury, Kent, England
[3] UCL, London, England
[4] Univ Kent, Canterbury, Kent, England
[5] European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Weltfriedensdienst eV, Berlin, Germany
关键词
SECURITY; FOREIGN;
D O I
10.1080/09644008.2020.1826439
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
As one of the founding states of the European Union (EU) and a long-standing member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), Germany has made significant contributions to both organisations and to European security. Despite being frequently accused as a free rider, this article claims that Germany takes the position of balancer in the EU-NATO relationship whereby it facilitates cooperation through mediating between both organisations and their member states. This article analyses Germany's role and conceptualises it as balancer in interorganisational relations. As a member of both organisations, the debates concern how Germany can make effective use of its geographical, cultural and economic positions to contribute to European security. It takes a 'midstream' position in which it balances between the EU and NATO and among other member states. This article argues that due to its expansive network of bilateral and minilateral relations, Germany emphasises its role as balancer by using its diplomatic skills to broker among fellow member states. A well-working and amicable EU-NATO relationship is indispensable for its own interests. This paper therefore takes into account its particular position and capabilities as well as its multilateral linkages to examine how Germany positions itself as balancer in the EU-NATO relationship.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 380
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Why states act through formal international organizations [J].
Abbott, KW ;
Snidal, D .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1998, 42 (01) :3-32
[2]   The NATO-EU-Turkey trilogy: the impact of the Cyprus conundrum [J].
Acikmese, Sinem Akgul ;
Triantaphyllou, Dimitrios .
SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN AND BLACK SEA STUDIES, 2012, 12 (04) :555-573
[3]   Learning to Lead? Germany and the Leadership Paradox in EU Foreign Policy [J].
Aggestam, Lisbeth ;
Hyde-Price, Adrian .
GERMAN POLITICS, 2020, 29 (01) :8-24
[4]  
Algieri Franco, 2011, DTSCH ENPOLITIK, P126
[5]   The Politics of International Regime Complexity [J].
Alter, Karen J. ;
Meunier, Sophie .
PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2009, 7 (01) :13-24
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GERMANY STILL RELUCT
[7]  
Baumann Rainer., 2001, GER POLIT, V10, P61, DOI DOI 10.1080/09644000412331307394
[8]   Welche Macht darf es denn Sein? Tracing 'Power' in German Foreign Policy Discourse [J].
Berenskotter, Felix ;
Stritzel, Holger .
GERMAN POLITICS, 2021, 30 (01) :31-50
[9]   Towards a theory of inter-organizational networking The Euro-Atlantic security institutions interacting [J].
Biermann, Rafael .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, 2008, 3 (02) :151-177
[10]  
BMVg, 2016, WHIT PAP GERM SEC PO