Pregnancy Recruitment for Population Research: the National Children's Study Vanguard Experience in Wayne County, Michigan

被引:12
作者
Kerver, Jean M. [1 ]
Elliott, Michael R. [3 ]
Norman, Gwendolyn S. [4 ]
Sokol, Robert J. [4 ]
Keating, Daniel P. [3 ]
Copeland, Glenn E. [7 ]
Johnson, Christine C. [5 ]
Cislo, Kendall K. [1 ,3 ]
Alcser, Kirsten H. [3 ]
Kruger-Ndiaye, Shonda R. [3 ]
Pennell, Beth-Ellen [3 ]
Mehta, Shobha [6 ]
Joseph, Christine L. M. [5 ]
Paneth, Nigel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Pediat & Human Dev, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Survey Res Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Detroit, MI USA
[7] Michigan Dept Community Hlth, Lansing, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prenatal care; pregnancy; recruiting study participants; practice-based research; population study; National Children's Study; ATTITUDES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/ppe.12047
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background To obtain a probability sample of pregnancies, the National Children's Study conducted door-to-door recruitment in randomly selected neighbourhoods in randomly selected counties in 200910. In 2011, an experiment was conducted in 10 US counties, in which the two-stage geographic sample was maintained, but participants were recruited in prenatal care provider offices. We describe our experience recruiting pregnant women this way in Wayne County, Michigan, a county where geographically eligible women attended 147 prenatal care settings, and comprised just 2% of total county pregnancies. Methods After screening for address eligibility in prenatal care offices, we used a three-part recruitment process: (1) providers obtained permission for us to contact eligible patients, (2) clinical research staff described the study to women in clinical settings, and (3) survey research staff visited the home to consent and interview eligible women. Results We screened 34065 addresses in 67 provider settings to find 215 eligible women. Providers obtained permission for research contact from 81.4% of eligible women, of whom 92.5% agreed to a home visit. All home-visited women consented, giving a net enrolment of 75%. From birth certificates, we estimate that 30% of eligible county pregnancies were enrolled, reaching 4050% in the final recruitment months. Conclusions We recruited a high fraction of pregnancies identified in a broad cross-section of provider offices. Nonetheless, because of time and resource constraints, we could enrol only a fraction of geographically eligible pregnancies. Our experience suggests that the probability sampling of pregnancies for research could be more efficiently achieved through sampling of providers rather than households.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 311
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STAT COUNT QUICKFACT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 41 PRINCIPAL INVESTI
[3]   Implementing Provider-based Sampling for the National Children's Study: Opportunities and Challenges [J].
Belanger, Kathleen ;
Buka, Stephen ;
Cherry, Debra C. ;
Dudley, Donald J. ;
Elliott, Michael R. ;
Hale, Daniel E. ;
Hertz-Picciotto, Irva ;
Illuzzi, Jessica L. ;
Paneth, Nigel ;
Robbins, James M. ;
Triche, Elizabeth W. ;
Bracken, Michael B. .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) :20-26
[4]   A Simple Method to Generate Equal-Sized Homogenous Strata or Clusters for Population-Based Sampling [J].
Elliott, Michael R. .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (04) :290-296
[5]   National Children's Study: Update in 2010 [J].
Hirschfeld, Steven ;
Songco, David ;
Kramer, Barnett S. ;
Guttmacher, Alan E. .
MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 78 (01) :119-125
[6]   New Models for Large Prospective Studies: Is There a Better Way? [J].
Manolio, Teri A. ;
Weis, Brenda K. ;
Cowie, Catherine C. ;
Hoover, Robert N. ;
Hudson, Kathy ;
Kramer, Barnett S. ;
Berg, Chris ;
Collins, Rory ;
Ewart, Wendy ;
Gaziano, J. Michael ;
Hirschfeld, Steven ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Masys, Daniel ;
McCarty, Catherine A. ;
McLaughlin, John ;
Patel, Alpa V. ;
Peakman, Tim ;
Pedersen, Nancy L. ;
Schaefer, Catherine ;
Scott, Joan A. ;
Sprosen, Timothy ;
Walport, Mark ;
Collins, Francis S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 175 (09) :859-866
[7]  
Michigan Department of Community Health, VIT STAT NAT PREGN I
[8]   Statistical and practical issues in the design of a national probability sample of births for the Vanguard Study of the National Children's Study [J].
Montaquila, Jill M. ;
Brick, J. Michael ;
Curtin, Lester R. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (13) :1368-1376
[9]   Prenatal care and delivery room staff attitudes toward research and the National Children's Study [J].
Mudd, Lanay M. ;
Pham, Xinh ;
Nechuta, Sarah ;
Elliott, Michael R. ;
Lepkowski, James M. ;
Paneth, Nigel .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2008, 12 (06) :684-691
[10]  
*NAT RES COUNC I M, 2008, NAT CHILDR STUD RES