Searching for resistance in wild Lens species against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)

被引:4
|
作者
Gore, Padmavati G. [1 ]
Tripathi, K. [1 ]
Chauhan, S. K. [1 ,2 ]
Singh, Mohar [1 ,2 ]
Bisht, I. S. [1 ,2 ]
Bhalla, S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Agr Res Inst, New Delhi 110012, India
[2] Natl Bur Plant Genet Resources, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Callosobruchus chinensis; Growth index; Lens species; Wild species; MACULATUS F; GENOTYPES;
D O I
10.18805/lr.v0iOF.6778
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A total of 51 accessions of different Lens spp. viz., Lens culinaris (cultivated) and L. culinaris subsp. odemensis, L. culinaris subsp. orientalis, L. orientalis, L. nigricans, L. lamottei and L. ervoides (wild species) were screened for their reaction to Callosobruchus chinensis under no choice artificial infestation conditions to find the. sources of resistance. Significant differences among the accessions in terms of number of eggs laid, development period, adult emergence, number of emergence holes of C. chinensis loss in seed weight on different Lens spp. were observed. Of the seven species tested, L. culinaris was the most preferred one for egg laying while L. ervoides was the least preferred. Based on Growth Index (GI), accessions were categorised as highly resistant (15 accessions, GI = 0.00), resistant (14, GI=0.00, to. 1.00), moderately resistant (16, GI=1.01 to 2.00) moderately susceptible (3, GI 2.01 to 3.00) susceptible (3, >3.01) to C. chinensis and the species have been arranged in the order of their resistance to C. chinensis. viz L. ervoides > L. lamottei > L. nigricans= L. orientalis > L. culinaris subsp. orientalis= L. culinaris subsp. odemensis > L. culnaris, i.e. L. ervoides was highly resistant and L. culnaris was the most susceptible. Correlation between GI and growth parameters of pulse beetle on different Lens spp. accessions indicated that GI had negative relationship with mean development period (-0.22) and significant positive relationship with adult emergence (+0.73), weight loss (+0.77) and eggs laid (+0.75).
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 636
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.
    Sahu, Prince
    Singh, Mahendra
    Pandey, Rakesh
    Mishra, Mukesh Kumar
    Singh, Akhilesh Kumar
    Singh, Bhupendra Kumar
    Singh, Surendra Kumar
    Rai, Ashutosh
    Chugh, Vishal
    Shukla, Gaurav
    Singh, Saurabh
    Singh, Kartikey
    Kumar, Mukul
    Singh, Chandra Mohan
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2023, 12 (06):
  • [2] EFFICACY OF SOME BOTANICALS AGAINST PULSE BEETLE, CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS (L.) IN CHICKPEA
    Sharma, Rupesh
    Devi, Renu
    Sharma, Ramesh Kumar
    Mehla, J. C.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2013, 36 (02) : 125 - 130
  • [3] Screening and selection of accessions in the genus Pisum L. for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)
    Azime Esen
    Hatice Sari
    Fedai Erler
    Alper Adak
    Duygu Sari
    Tuba Eker
    Huseyin Canci
    Cengiz İkten
    Abdullah Kahraman
    Cengiz Toker
    Euphytica, 2019, 215
  • [4] Screening and selection of accessions in the genus Pisum L. for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)
    Esen, Azime
    Sari, Hatice
    Erler, Fedai
    Adak, Alper
    Sari, Duygu
    Eker, Tuba
    Canci, Huseyin
    Ikten, Cengiz
    Kahraman, Abdullah
    Toker, Cengiz
    EUPHYTICA, 2019, 215 (04)
  • [5] Correction to: Screening and selection of accessions in the genus Pisum L. for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)
    Azime Esen
    Hatice Sari
    Fedai Erler
    Alper Adak
    Duygu Sari
    Tuba Eker
    Huseyin Canci
    Cengiz İkten
    Abdullah Kahraman
    Cengiz Toker
    Euphytica, 2019, 215
  • [6] Insect repellent activity of certain plant extracts against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.
    Kokate, SD
    Chintalwar, GJ
    NATIONAL ACADEMY SCIENCE LETTERS-INDIA, 2003, 26 (1-2): : 44 - 46
  • [7] Screening of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] accessions against pulse- beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)
    Tripathi, Kuldeep
    Chauhan, Sumit Kumar
    Gore, Padmawati G.
    Prasad, T. V.
    Sirinivasan, Kalyani
    Bhalla, Shashi
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2015, 38 (05) : 675 - 680
  • [8] Efficacy of various grain protectants against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) infesting greengram, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek
    Chander, Subash
    Singal, Shiv K.
    Kumar, Dalip
    Kumar, Naresh
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2010, 11 (03) : 741 - 744
  • [9] Screening and selection of accessions in the genus Pisum L. for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) (vol 215, 82, 2019)
    Esen, Azime
    Sari, Hatice
    Erler, Fedai
    Adak, Alper
    Sari, Duygu
    Eker, Tuba
    Canci, Huseyin
    Ikten, Cengiz
    Kahraman, Abdullah
    Toker, Cengiz
    EUPHYTICA, 2019, 215 (10)
  • [10] PHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL BASIS OF RESISTANCE IN COWPEA [VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP.] ACCESSIONS TO PULSE-BEETLE, CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS (L.)
    Tripathi, Kuldeep
    Bhalla, Shashi
    Srinivasan, Kalyani
    Prasad, T. V.
    Gautam, R. D.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2013, 36 (05) : 457 - 466