Validation of the confusion assessment method in the palliative care setting

被引:77
作者
Ryan, K. [1 ]
Leonard, M. [2 ]
Guerin, S. [3 ]
Donnelly, S. [4 ,5 ]
Conroy, M. [4 ,5 ]
Meagher, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] St Francis Hosp, Dublin 5, Ireland
[2] Hlth Serv Execut Midwest Hosp, Dept Adult Psychiat, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Dept Psychol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[4] Hlth Serv Execut Midwest Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Limerick, Ireland
[5] Milford Care Ctr, Limerick, Ireland
关键词
Confusion Assessment Method; delirium; diagnostic tests and procedures; palliative care; sensitivity and specificity; MEMORY-CONCENTRATION TEST; ADVANCED CANCER; COGNITIVE TEST; DELIRIUM; SCALE;
D O I
10.1177/0269216308099210
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is widely used in the palliative care setting despite the fact that its performance in this population has not been validated. The aim of the study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the CAM when used by Non-Consultant Hospital Doctors (NCHDs) working in a specialist palliative care unit. A pilot phase was performed in which NCHDs received a 1-hour training session based on the original CAM training manual. 32 patients underwent 33 assessments in the pilot phase but the sensitivity of the CAM was only 0.5 (0.22-0.78) and specificity was 1.0 (0.81-1.0). An 'enhanced' training programme was devised that took place over two 1-hour sessions and involved case-based learning focused on the areas where the NCHDs were experiencing difficulty. 52 patients underwent 54 assessments in the main phase of the study and the performance of the CAM improved significantly. Sensitivity was 0.88 (0.62-0.98) and specificity was 1.0 (0.88-1.0). The results suggest that the CAM is a valid screening tool for delirium in the palliative care setting but its performance is dependent on the skill of the operator. NCHDs require a certain standard of training before becoming proficient in its use. Palliative Medicine (2009); 23: 40-45
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 45
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CONFUSION ASSESSMENT
  • [2] The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale
    Breitbart, W
    Rosenfeld, B
    Roth, A
    Smith, MJ
    Cohen, K
    Passik, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1997, 13 (03) : 128 - 137
  • [3] The delirium experience: Delirium recall and delirium-related distress in hospitalized patients with cancer, their spouses/caregivers, and their nurses
    Breitbart, W
    Gibson, C
    Tremblay, A
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2002, 43 (03) : 183 - 194
  • [4] Caraceni A, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V89, P1145, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000901)89:5<1145::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-X
  • [6] Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult?
    Ewing, G
    Rogers, M
    Barclay, S
    Mccabe, J
    Martin, A
    Todd, C
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 18 (05) : 452 - 459
  • [7] MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN
    FOLSTEIN, MF
    FOLSTEIN, SE
    MCHUGH, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) : 189 - 198
  • [8] Validation of a cognitive test for delirium in medical ICU patients
    Hart, RP
    Levenson, JL
    Sessler, CN
    Best, AM
    Schwartz, SM
    Rutherford, LE
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1996, 37 (06) : 533 - 546
  • [9] Methods for assessment of cognitive failure and delirium in palliative care patients: implications for practice and research
    Hjermstad, MJ
    Loge, JH
    Kaasa, S
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 18 (06) : 494 - 506
  • [10] Inouye S. K., CONFUSION ASSESSMENT