Cerebellar transcranial current stimulation - An intraindividual comparison of different techniques

被引:10
作者
Herzog, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Berger, Till M. [1 ]
Pauly, Martje G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xue, Honghu [4 ]
Rueckert, Elmar [5 ]
Muenchau, Alexander [1 ]
Baeumer, Tobias [1 ]
Weissbach, Anne [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Inst Syst Motor Sci, Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Neurol, Lubeck, Germany
[3] Univ Lubeck, Inst Neurogenet, Lubeck, Germany
[4] Univ Lubeck, Inst Robot & Cognit Syst, Lubeck, Germany
[5] Univ Leoben, Leoben, Austria
关键词
cerebellum; plasticity; tRNS; tACS; tDCS; TMS; IMU; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; MOVEMENT PRIMITIVES; BRAIN INHIBITION; EXCITABILITY; CONNECTIVITY; MODULATION; INPUT; HAND;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2022.987472
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Transcranial current stimulation (tCS) techniques have been shown to induce cortical plasticity. As an important relay in the motor system, the cerebellum is an interesting target for plasticity induction using tCS, aiming to modulate its excitability and connectivity. However, until now it remains unclear, which is the most effective tCS method for inducing plasticity in the cerebellum. Thus, in this study, the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 50 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (50 Hz tACS), and high frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) were compared with sham stimulation in 20 healthy subjects in a within-subject design. tCS was applied targeting the cerebellar lobe VIIIA using neuronavigation. We measured corticospinal excitability, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI), and cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) and performed a sensor-based movement analysis at baseline and three times after the intervention (post1 = 15 min; post2 = 55 min; post3 = 95 min). Corticospinal excitability increased following cerebellar tACS and tRNS compared to sham stimulation. This effect was most pronounced directly after stimulation but lasted for at least 55 min after tACS. Cortico-cortical and cerebello-cortical conditioning protocols, as well as sensor-based movement analyses, did not change. Our findings suggest that cerebellar 50 Hz tACS is the most effective protocol to change corticospinal excitability.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Modulation of Cortical Oscillations by Low-Frequency Direct Cortical Stimulation Is State-Dependent [J].
Alagapan, Sankaraleengam ;
Schmidt, Stephen L. ;
Lefebvre, Jeremie ;
Hadar, Eldad ;
Shin, Hae Won ;
Froehlich, Flavio .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2016, 14 (03)
[2]   Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement [J].
Antal, Andrea ;
Luber, Bruce ;
Brem, Anna-Katharine ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Brunoni, Andre R. ;
Kadosh, Roi Cohen ;
Dubljevic, Veljko ;
Fecteau, Shirley ;
Ferreri, Florinda ;
Floeel, Agnes ;
Hallett, Mark ;
Hamilton, Roy H. ;
Herrmann, Christoph S. ;
Lavidor, Michal ;
Loo, Collen ;
Lustenberger, Caroline ;
Machado, Sergio ;
Miniussi, Carlo ;
Moliadze, Vera ;
Nitsche, Michael A. ;
Rossi, Simone ;
Rossini, Paolo M. ;
Santarnecchi, Emiliano ;
Seeck, Margitta ;
Thut, Gregor ;
Turi, Zsolt ;
Ugawa, Yoshikazu ;
Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan ;
Wenderoth, Nicole ;
Wexler, Anna ;
Ziemann, Ulf ;
Paulus, Walter .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 7 :146-165
[3]   Entrainment of cerebellar purkinje cells with directional AC electric fields in anesthetized rats [J].
Asan, Ahmet S. ;
Lang, Eric J. ;
Sahin, Mesut .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (06) :1548-1558
[4]   The effect of the anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the cerebellum on the motor cortex excitability [J].
Ates, Mehlika Panpalli ;
Alaydin, Hahl Can ;
Cengiz, Bulent .
BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2018, 140 :114-119
[5]   Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on cerebellar-brain inhibition in humans: A systematic evaluation [J].
Batsikadze, Giorgi ;
Rezaee, Zeynab ;
Chang, Dae-In ;
Gerwig, Marcus ;
Herlitze, Stefan ;
Dutta, Anirban ;
Nitsche, Michael A. ;
Timmann, Dagmar .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (05) :1177-1186
[6]   Mapping the mechanisms of transcranial alternating current stimulation: a pathway from network effects to cognition [J].
Battleday, Ruairidh M. ;
Muller, Timothy ;
Clayton, Michael S. ;
Kadosh, Roi Cohen .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 5
[7]   Does cerebellar non-invasive brain stimulation affect corticospinal excitability in healthy individuals? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis [J].
Behrangrad, Shabnam ;
Zoghi, Maryam ;
Kidgell, Dawson ;
Jaberzadeh, Shapour .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 706 :128-139
[8]   Stimulation over the cerebellum with a regular figure-of-eight coil induces reduced motor cortex inhibition in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy [J].
Benussi, Alberto ;
Dell'Era, Valentina ;
Cantoni, Valentina ;
Turrone, Rosanna ;
Pilotto, Andrea ;
Alberici, Antonella ;
Cotelli, Maria Sofia ;
Rizzetti, Cristina ;
Padovani, Alessandro ;
Borroni, Barbara .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (05) :1290-1297
[9]   Cerebello-spinal tDCS in ataxia A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial [J].
Benussi, Alberto ;
Dell'Era, Valentina ;
Cantoni, Valentina ;
Bonetta, Elisa ;
Grasso, Roberto ;
Manenti, Rosa ;
Cotelli, Maria ;
Padovani, Alessandro ;
Borroni, Barbara .
NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (12) :E1090-E1101
[10]   Consensus paper on short-interval intracortical inhibition and other transcranial magnetic stimulation intracortical paradigms in movement disorders [J].
Berardelli, Alfredo ;
Abbruzzese, Giovanni ;
Chen, Robert ;
Orth, Michael ;
Ridding, Michael C. ;
Stinear, Cathy ;
Suppa, Antonio ;
Trompetto, Carlo ;
Thompson, Philip D. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (03) :183-191