Invasibility and species richness of island endemic arthropods: a general model of endemic vs. exotic species

被引:100
作者
Borges, PAV [1 ]
Lobo, JM
de Azevedo, EB
Gaspar, CS
Melo, C
Nunes, LV
机构
[1] Unv Acores, Dept Ciencias Agr, CITA A, P-9700851 Terceira, Azores, Portugal
[2] CSIC, Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat, Dept Biodiversidad & Biol Evolut Entomol, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Biodivers & Macroecol Grp, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
arthropods; Azores; distribution; endemic species; environmental variables; introduced species; species richness;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01324.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim This paper has two objectives. First, we examine how a variety of biotic, abiotic and anthropogenic factors influence the endemic and introduced arthropod richness on an oceanic island. Second, we look at the relationship between the endemic and introduced arthropod richness, to ask whether areas with high levels of endemic species richness deter invasions. Location The work was carried out on a young volcanic island, Terceira, in the Azores. Methods We used standard techniques to collect data on arthropod species richness. Environmental data were obtained from the CIELO climatic model and using GIS. The explanatory value of environmental variables on a small-scale gradient of endemic and exotic arthropod species richness was examined with generalized linear models (GLMs). In addition, the impact of both endemic and exotic species richness in the communities was assessed by entering them after the environmental variable(s) to see if they contributed significantly to the final model (the hierarchical method). Results Abiotic (climatic and geomorphological) variables gave a better explanation of the variation in endemic species richness, whereas anthropogenic variables explained most of the variation in introduced species richness. Furthermore, after accounting for all environmental variables, part of the unexplained variance in the endemic species richness is explained by the introduced species richness and vice-versa. That is, areas with high levels of endemic species richness had many introduced species. There is evidence of a somewhat inverse spatial distribution between a group of oceanic-type, forest-dwelling, endemic, relict arthropods and a group of more generalist endemic arthropods that are able to survive in disturbed marginal sites particularly rich in non-indigenous species. Main conclusions Richness of endemic species is mainly driven by abiotic factors such as a climatic axis (oceanic-type localities with lower temperatures and summer precipitations) and a binary variable CALD (location of sites in caldeiras or ravines), whereas richness of introduced species depends on disturbance related factors. However, after factoring out these major influences, there is a correlation between endemic and introduced richness, suggesting that - independent of the environmental and geographical factors that affect the distribution of endemic or introduced species - the richest endemic assemblages are more prone to invasion, due probably to a facilitation process. Inconclusive evidence suggests that non-indigenous species are limited to those sites under anthropogenic influence located mainly near forest edges, but the rate of expansion of those species to high-altitude, core pristine sites has still to be tested.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 187
页数:19
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1890/0012-9623(1999)080[0231:TT]2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIOL INVASIONS
[4]  
AZEVEDO EB, 1996, THESIS U AZORES AZOR
[5]  
Bolger DT, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P1230, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1230:AIUHFI]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Ranking the Azorean Natural Forest Reserves for conservation using their endemic arthropods [J].
Borges, P. A. V. ;
Serrano, A. R. ;
Quartau, J. A. .
JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2000, 4 (02) :129-147
[8]  
Borges P.A.V., 2005, A list of the terrestrial fauna (Mollusca and Arthropoda) and flora (Bryophyta, Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta) from the Azores
[9]  
Borges Paulo A.V., 1999, Arquipelago Boletim da Universidade dos Acores Ciencias Biologicas e Marinhas, V17A, P1
[10]   Ranking protected areas in the Azores using standardised sampling of soil epigean arthropods [J].
Borges, PAV ;
Aguiar, C ;
Amaral, J ;
Amorim, IR ;
André, G ;
Arraiol, A ;
Baz, A ;
Dinis, F ;
Enghoff, H ;
Gaspar, C ;
Ilharco, F ;
Mahnert, V ;
Melo, C ;
Pereira, F ;
Quartau, JA ;
Ribeiro, SP ;
Ribes, J ;
Serrano, ARM ;
Sousa, AB ;
Strassen, RZ ;
Vieira, L ;
Vieira, V ;
Vitorino, A ;
Wunderlich, J .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2005, 14 (09) :2029-2060