Complexity theories and organizational change

被引:246
作者
Burnes, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
关键词
complexity theories; organizational change; chaos; self-organization; order-generating rules;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Complexity theory or, more appropriately, theories, serves as an umbrella term for a number of theories, ideas and research programmes that are derived from scientific disciplines such as meteorology, biology, physics, chemistry and mathematics. Complexity theories are increasingly being seen by academics and practitioners as a way of understanding and changing organizations. The aim of this paper is to review the nature of complexity theories and their importance and implications for organizations and organizational change. It begins by showing how perspectives on organizational change have altered over the last 20 years. This is followed by an examination of complexity theories and their implications for organizational change. The paper concludes by arguing that, even in the natural sciences, the complexity approach is not fully developed or unchallenged, and that, as yet, organization theorists do not appear to have moved beyond the stage of using it as metaphor rather than as a mathematical way of analysing and managing organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 90
页数:18
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Allen P., 2001, Emerg. Complex. Organ, V3, P24, DOI [10.1207/S15327000EM0301_03, DOI 10.1207/S15327000EM0301_03]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, BOUNDARIES LEADING R
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The essence of chaos
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ORG BEHAV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1988, IND BEHAV
[7]  
[Anonymous], LIBERATION MANAGEMEN
[8]  
[Anonymous], BIRTH CHAORDIC AGE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The emergence of leadership: Linking self-organization and ethics
[10]   Commentary: The potential of chaos theory and complexity theory for health services management [J].
Arndt, M ;
Bigelow, B .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2000, 25 (01) :35-38