Evaluation of an ensemble of Arctic regional climate models:: spatiotemporal fields during the SHEBA year

被引:58
作者
Rinke, A
Dethloff, K
Cassano, JJ
Christensen, JH
Curry, JA
Du, P
Girard, E
Haugen, JE
Jacob, D
Jones, CG
Koltzow, M
Laprise, R
Lynch, AH
Pfeifer, S
Serreze, MC
Shaw, MJ
Tjernström, M
Wyser, K
Zagar, M
机构
[1] Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Program Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Boulder, CO USA
[4] Danish Meterol Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Univ Quebec, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, Oslo, Norway
[8] Monash Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00382-005-0095-3
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Simulations of eight different regional climate models (RCMs) have been performed for the period September 1997-September 1998, which coincides with the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) project period. Each of the models employed approximately the same domain covering the western Arctic, the same horizontal resolution of 50 km, and the same boundary forcing. The models differ in their vertical resolution as well as in the treatments of dynamics and physical parameterizations. Both the common features and differences of the simulated spatiotemporal patterns of geopotential, temperature, cloud cover, and long-/shortwave downward radiation between the individual model simulations are investigated. With this work, we quantify the scatter among the models and therefore the magnitude of disagreement and unreliability of current Arctic RCM simulations. Even with the relatively constrained experimental design we notice a considerable scatter among the different RCMs. We found the largest across-model scatter in the 2 m temperature over land, in the surface radiation fluxes, and in the cloud cover which implies a reduced confidence level for these variables.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 472
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
ACIA, 2004, IMPACTS WARMING ARCT, P146
[2]   A comparison of cloud and boundary layer variables in the ECMWF forecast model with observations at Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) ice camp [J].
Beesley, JA ;
Bretherton, CS ;
Jakob, C ;
Andreas, EL ;
Intrieri, JM ;
Uttal, TA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D10) :12337-12349
[3]   Evaluation of Greenland ice sheet surface climate in the HIRHAM regional climate model using automatic weather station data [J].
Box, JE ;
Rinke, A .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2003, 16 (09) :1302-1319
[4]  
Bromwich DH, 2001, MON WEATHER REV, V129, P2290, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2290:MMOKWO>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Evaluation of polar MM5 simulations of Greenland's atmospheric circulation [J].
Cassano, JJ ;
Box, JE ;
Bromwich, DH ;
Li, L ;
Steffen, K .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D24) :33867-33889
[7]  
Caya D, 1999, MON WEATHER REV, V127, P341, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<0341:ASISLR>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
CHRISTENSEN JH, 1996, 964 DMI, P51
[10]  
COMISO JC, 2002, BOOTSTRAP SEA ICE CO