Affective Mediators of Intergroup Contact: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in South Africa

被引:234
作者
Swart, Hermann [1 ]
Hewstone, Miles [2 ]
Christ, Oliver [3 ]
Voci, Alberto [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Psychol, ZA-7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
[3] Univ Marburg, Dept Psychol, D-3550 Marburg, Germany
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Gen Psychol, Padua, Italy
关键词
intergroup contact; cross-group friendship; full longitudinal mediation; intergroup anxiety; empathy; CROSS-GROUP FRIENDSHIPS; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; REDUCE PREJUDICE; MISSING DATA; ANXIETY; ATTITUDES; EMPATHY; ACCESSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1037/a0024450
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Intergroup contact (especially cross-group friendship) is firmly established as a powerful strategy for combating group-based prejudice (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006). Great advances have been made in understanding how contact reduces prejudice (Brown & Hewstone, 2005), highlighting the importance of affective mediators (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2008). The present study, a 3-wave longitudinal study undertaken among minority-status Colored high school children in South Africa (N = 465), explored the full mediation of the effects of cross-group friendships on positive outgroup attitudes, perceived outgroup variability, and negative action tendencies via positive (affective empathy) and negative (intergroup anxiety) affective mediators simultaneously. The target group was the majority-status White South African outgroup. As predicted, a bidirectional model described the relationship between contact, mediators, and prejudice significantly better over time than either autoregressive or unidirectional longitudinal models. However, full longitudinal mediation was only found in the direction from Time 1 contact to Time 3 prejudice (via Time 2 mediators), supporting the underlying tenet of the contact hypothesis. Specifically, cross-group friendships were positively associated with positive outgroup attitudes (via affective empathy) and perceived outgroup variability (via intergroup anxiety and affective empathy) and were negatively associated with negative action tendencies (via affective empathy). Following Pettigrew and Tropp (2008), we compared two alternative hypotheses regarding the relationship between intergroup anxiety and affective empathy over time. Time 1 intergroup anxiety was indirectly negatively associated with Time 3 affective empathy, via Time 2 cross-group friendships. We discuss the theoretical and empirical contributions of this study and make suggestions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / 1238
页数:18
相关论文
共 84 条
[21]   'Gringos' in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias [J].
Eller, A ;
Abrams, D .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2003, 6 (01) :55-75
[22]   A Primer on Maximum Likelihood Algorithms Available for Use With Missing Data [J].
Enders, Craig K. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2001, 8 (01) :128-141
[23]  
Finchilescu G., 2006, CONT INT REL 50 YEAR
[24]  
Finkel S., 1995, CAUSAL ANAL PANEL DA
[25]   Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes [J].
Finlay, KA ;
Stephan, WG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 30 (08) :1720-1737
[26]   Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism [J].
Galinsky, AD ;
Moskowitz, GB .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (04) :708-724
[27]  
Gibson JL., 2004, OVERCOMING APARTHEID
[28]  
Grossberg Arlene., 2002, Public Attitudes in Contemporary South Africa, P63
[29]   Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes toward older adults: Moderator and mediator effects [J].
Harwood, J ;
Hewstone, M ;
Paolini, S ;
Voci, A .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2005, 31 (03) :393-406
[30]   Do observer ratings validate self-reports of intergroup contact?: A round-robin analysis [J].
Hewstone, Miles ;
Judd, Charles M. ;
Sharp, Melanie .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 47 (03) :599-609