Chickpea molecular breeding: New tools and concepts

被引:115
作者
Millan, T
Clarke, HJ
Siddique, KHM
Buhariwalla, HK
Gaur, PM
Kumar, J
Gil, J
Kahl, G
Winter, P
机构
[1] Univ Cordoba, Dept Genet, E-14017 Cordoba, Spain
[2] Univ Western Australia, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Ctr Legumes Mediterranean Agr, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Int Crops Res Inst Semi Arid Trop, Patancheru 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India
[4] Beans Hlth Res Fdn, Inkerman, ON K0E 1J0, Canada
[5] Frankfurt Innovat Ctr Biotechnol, GenXPro, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
chickpea breeding; functional genomics; genetic map; pathogen resistance; stress tolerance;
D O I
10.1007/s10681-006-4261-4
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Chickpea is a cool season grain legume of exceptionally high nutritive value and most versatile food use. It is mostly grown under rain fed conditions in arid and semi-arid areas around the world. Despite growing demand and high yield potential, chickpea yield is unstable and productivity is stagnant at unacceptably low levels. Major yield increases could be achieved by development and use of cultivars that resist/tolerate abiotic and biotic stresses. In recent years the wide use of early maturing cultivars that escape drought stress led to significant increases in chickpea productivity. In the Mediterranean region, yield could be increased by shifting the sowing date from spring to winter. However, this is hampered by the sensitivity of the crop to low temperatures and the fungal pathogen Ascochyta rabiei. Drought, pod borer (Helicoverpa spp.) and the fungus Fusarium oxysporum additionally reduce harvests there and in other parts of the world. Tolerance to rising salinity will be a future advantage in many regions. Therefore, chickpea breeding focuses on increasing yield by pyramiding genes for resistance/tolerance to the fungi, to pod borer, salinity, cold and drought into elite germplasm. Progress in breeding necessitates a better understanding of the genetics underlying these traits. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) would allow a better targeting of the desired genes. Genetic mapping in chickpea, for a long time hampered by the little variability in chickpea's genome, is today facilitated by highly polymorphic, co-dominant microsatellite-based markers. Their application for the genetic mapping of traits led to inter-laboratory comparable maps. This paper reviews the current situation of chickpea genome mapping, tagging of genes for ascochyta blight, fusarium wilt resistance and other traits, and requirements for MAS. Conventional breeding strategies to tolerate/avoid drought and chilling effects at flowering time, essential for changing from spring to winter sowing, are described. Recent approaches and future prospects for functional genomics of chickpea are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 103
页数:23
相关论文
共 186 条
[1]   Quantitative trait loci governing carotenoid concentration and weight in seeds of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) [J].
Abbo, S ;
Molina, C ;
Jungmann, R ;
Grusak, MA ;
Berkovitch, Z ;
Reifen, R ;
Kahl, G ;
Winter, P ;
Reifen, R .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2005, 111 (02) :185-195
[2]   Evolution of cultivated chickpea: four bottlenecks limit diversity and constrain adaptation [J].
Abbo, S ;
Berger, J ;
Turner, NC .
FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2003, 30 (10) :1081-1087
[3]  
ABBO S, 2002, PLANT BREEDING 11 MI, P463
[4]  
AGHARKAR SP, 1991, MED PLANTS BOMBAY PR, P62
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, P 4 EUR C GRAIN LEG
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT CHICKP C IND GAN
[7]   Tolerance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) lines to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne java']javanica (Treub) Chitwood [J].
Ansari, MA ;
Patel, BA ;
Mhase, NL ;
Patel, DJ ;
Douaik, A ;
Sharma, SB .
GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2004, 51 (04) :449-453
[8]  
Arumuganathan K., 1991, PLANT MOL BIOL REP, V9, P229, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02672073
[9]  
ASHRAF M, 1992, TROPENLANDWIRT, V93, P45
[10]   Cloning and characterization of the mating type (MAT) locus from Ascochyta rabiei (teleomorph: Didymella rabiei) and a MAT phylogeny of legume-associated Ascochyta spp. [J].
Barve, MP ;
Arie, T ;
Salimath, SS ;
Muehlbauer, FJ ;
Peever, TL .
FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 39 (02) :151-167