Measurement Invariance of the Student Risk Screening Scale Across Time and Gender

被引:4
作者
Fredrick, Stephanie Secord [1 ]
Drevon, Daniel D. [1 ]
Jervinsky, Megan [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Michigan Univ, Psychol Dept, 1101 S Franklin St,Sloan Hall 103, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
[2] Bay Arenac Intermediate Sch Dist, Bay City, MI USA
关键词
behavior assessment; measurement invariance; universal screening; INITIAL EVIDENCE; SCORE RELIABILITY; BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS; FIT INDEXES; VALIDITY; PREVALENCE; FRAMEWORK; TEACHERS; CHILDREN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1037/spq0000278
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Universal screening for behavioral/mental health risk is a critical component of multitiered systems of support, allowing for early identification of students in need of prevention and/or intervention services. The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS; Drummond, 1994) is one commonly used universal screening tool intended to measure externalizing behavior difficulties. Although the reliability and criterion-related validity of the SRSS has been studied extensively, there are limited data supporting its construct validity. To this end, the current study investigated the internal structure of the SRSS and the degree to which it demonstrated measurement invariance across time (i.e., fall, winter, spring) and gender (i.e., male, female). Fifty-five teachers completed the SRSS for 1,220 students in kindergarten through 5th grade across three elementary schools during fall, winter, and spring benchmarking periods. Results of a confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the SRSS as a single-factor measure of externalizing behavior difficulties. Results of multigroup confirmatory factor analyses supported its measurement invariance across time and gender. These findings further establish the psychometric defensibility of the SRSS as used within multitiered systems of support. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed for practitioners and researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 167
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Albers C.A., 2014, BEST PRACTICES SCH P, P121
[2]  
American Educational Research Association, 2014, AM PSYCH ASS NAT COU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, MPLUS USERS GUIDE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, STUDENT RISK SCREENI
[5]   A Preliminary Investigation of Emotional and Behavioral Screening Practices in K-12 Schools [J].
Bruhn, Allison Leigh ;
Woods-Groves, Suzanne ;
Huddle, Sally .
EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN, 2014, 37 (04) :611-634
[6]   Gender Socialization in Chinese Kindergartens: Teachers' Contributions [J].
Chen, Eve Siu Ling ;
Rao, Nirmala .
SEX ROLES, 2011, 64 (1-2) :103-116
[7]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255
[8]   Children with co-occurring academic and behavior problems in first grade: Distal outcomes in twelfth grade [J].
Darney, Dana ;
Reinke, Wendy M. ;
Herman, Keith C. ;
Stormont, Melissa ;
Ialongo, Nicholas S. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 51 (01) :117-128
[9]   A Comparison of Teacher Nomination and Screening to Identify Behavioral and Emotional Risk Within a Sample of Underrepresented Students [J].
Dowdy, Erin ;
Doane, Kymberly ;
Eklund, Katie ;
Dever, Bridget V. .
JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2013, 21 (02) :127-137
[10]  
Eklund K., 2009, CALIFORNIA PSYCHOL, V14, P89, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF03340954