Techno-economic analysis of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)

被引:45
作者
Jiang, Yuan [1 ]
Bhattacharyya, Debangsu [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Chem & Biomed Engn, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
Coal; Biomass; Shale gas; Direct liquefaction; CO2 capture and storage; Techno-economic analysis; COMBINED-CYCLE PLANT; NATURAL-GAS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; LIQUEFACTION; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN; ENERGY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.084
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this paper, techno-economic analysis of direct coal biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants is performed in Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (APEA) using high fidelity process models developed in Aspen Plus for four different configurations of direct CBTL plants. Results from the economic model are validated with the data in the open literature, if available. Sensitivity studies are conducted to evaluate the impacts of key investment parameters, design parameters, and potential government-subsidized credits on the main economic measures including net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR); break-even oil price (BEOP) and equivalent oil price (EOP). Using the North America 2015 pricing basis in APEA, this study shows that the BEOP of direct CBTL processes ranges from $56.91bbl to $80.5/bbl for large scale (50,000 bbl/day) plants and from $77.3/bbl to $97.5/bbl for small scale (10,000 bbl/day) plants. It is observed that integrating a carbon capture and storage (CCS) unit to the direct CBTL process can increase the BEOP by about 10%, while utilization of the cheap and abundant shale gas (especially in the continental US) can make the direct liquefaction processes considerably more attractive than the indirect CBTL processes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 448
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Ai J, 2007, THESIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], COAL CLEAN GASOLINE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, DEAC2291PC90027
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, GAS RES MAT COAL LIQ
[5]  
[Anonymous], IEEE 81 VEH TECHN C
[6]   Economic evaluations of direct, indirect and hybrid coal liquefaction [J].
Bae, Jong-Soo ;
Hwang, In Sung ;
Kweon, Yeong-Jin ;
Choi, Young-Chan ;
Park, Se Joon ;
Kim, Hak-Joo ;
Jung, Heon ;
Han, Choon .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 29 (07) :868-875
[7]   Kinetics and Mechanism of Steam Gasification of Char from Hydrothermally Treated Woody Biomass [J].
Bai, Lei ;
Karnowo ;
Kudo, Shinji ;
Norinaga, Koyo ;
Wang, Yong-gang ;
Hayashi, Jun-ichiro .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2014, 28 (11) :7133-7139
[8]   Novel Natural Gas to Liquids Processes: Process Synthesis and Global Optimization Strategies [J].
Baliban, Richard C. ;
Elia, Josephine A. ;
Floudas, Christodoulos A. .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2013, 59 (02) :505-531
[9]   Optimization framework for the simultaneous process synthesis, heat and power integration of a thermochemical hybrid biomass, coal, and natural gas facility [J].
Baliban, Richard C. ;
Elia, Josephine A. ;
Floudas, Christodoulos A. .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 35 (09) :1647-1690
[10]  
Bechtel, 1998, DEAC2293PC91029 BECH