Is there a causal relationship between executive function and liability to mental health and substance use? A Mendelian randomization approach

被引:5
作者
Burton, Sabrina M., I [1 ]
Sallis, Hannah M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hatoum, Alexander S. [4 ]
Munafo, Marcus R. [1 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
Reed, Zoe E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Psychol Sci, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Ctr Acad Mental Hlth, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, MRC Integrat Epidemiol Unit, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol Biomed Res Ctr, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Bristol BS28 2BN, Avon, England
[6] Univ Bristol, Bristol BS28 2BN, Avon, England
来源
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE | 2022年 / 9卷 / 12期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国科研创新办公室; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Mendelian randomization; executive function; mental health; substance use; CANNABIS USE; METAANALYSIS; COGNITION; SMOKING; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1098/rsos.220631
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Poorer performance in tasks testing executive function (EF) is associated with a range of psychopathologies such as schizophrenia, major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety, as well as smoking and alcohol consumption. We used two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization to examine whether these may reflect causal relationships and the direction of causation. We used genome-wide association study summary data (N = 17 310 to 848 460) for a common EF factor score (cEF), schizophrenia, MDD, anxiety, smoking initiation, alcohol consumption, alcohol dependence and cannabis use disorder (CUD). We found evidence of increased cEF on reduced schizophrenia liability (OR = 0.10; CI: 0.05 to 0.19; p-value = 3.43 x 10(-12)), MDD liability (OR = 0.52; CI: 0.38 to 0.72; p-value = 5.23 x 10(-05)), drinks per week (beta = -0.06; CI: -0.10 to -0.02; p-value = 0.003) and CUD liability (OR = 0.27; CI: 0.12 to 0.61; p-value = 1.58 x 10(-03)). We also found evidence of increased schizophrenia liability (beta = -0.04; CI: -0.04 to -0.03; p-value = 3.25 x 10(-27)) and smoking initiation on decreased cEF (beta = -0.06; CI: -0.09 to -0.03; p-value = 6.11 x 10(-05)). Our results indicate potential causal relationships between cEF and mental health and substance use. Further studies are required to improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of these effects, but our results suggest that EF may be a promising intervention target for mental health and substance use.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Banaj Nerisa, 2018, Schizophr Res Cogn, V12, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.scog.2018.02.001
  • [2] Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic
    Bowden, Jack
    Del Greco, Fabiola M.
    Minelli, Cosetta
    Smith, George Davey
    Sheehan, Nuala A.
    Thompson, John R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (06) : 1961 - 1974
  • [3] Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator
    Bowden, Jack
    Smith, George Davey
    Haycock, Philip C.
    Burgess, Stephen
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 40 (04) : 304 - 314
  • [4] Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression
    Bowden, Jack
    Smith, George Davey
    Burgess, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (02) : 512 - 525
  • [5] Mendelian Randomization Analysis With Multiple Genetic Variants Using Summarized Data
    Burgess, Stephen
    Butterworth, Adam
    Thompson, Simon G.
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 37 (07) : 658 - 665
  • [6] Burton SMI, 2022, medRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2022.01.12.22269153, 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6330194, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.C.6330194]
  • [7] Burton Sabrina, 2021, data.bris, DOI 10.5523/BRIS.2EJXINNLT7KMR2HDA2INFX5R1K
  • [8] Mendelian randomisation for nutritional psychiatry
    Carnegie, Rebecca
    Zheng, Jie
    Sallis, Hannah M.
    Jones, Hannah J.
    Wade, Kaitlin H.
    Evans, Jonathan
    Zammit, Stan
    Munafo, Marcus R.
    Martin, Richard M.
    [J]. LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 7 (02): : 208 - 216
  • [9] Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not
    Diamond, Adele
    Ling, Daphne S.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 18 : 34 - 48
  • [10] Executive Functions
    Diamond, Adele
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 : 135 - 168