Undergraduate teaching audit and evaluation using an extended MABAC method underq-rung orthopair fuzzy environment

被引:40
作者
Gong, Jia-Wei [1 ]
Li, Qiang [1 ]
Yin, Linsen [2 ]
Liu, Hu-Chen [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Sch Financial Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ITARA method; MABAC method; q-rung orthopair fuzzy set; teaching audit and evaluation; teaching quality evaluation; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; INTERVAL TYPE-2; LOGIC SYSTEMS; QUALITY; SELECTION; AGGREGATION; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; AHP;
D O I
10.1002/int.22278
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Undergraduate teaching audit and evaluation (UTAE) is a new type of evaluation pattern, which is extremely important for a university to improve its quality assurance system and enhance teaching quality. Selecting an optimal university for benchmarking through UTAE to promote the quality of teaching can be regarded as a complex multicriteria decision making (MCDM) problem. Furthermore, in the process of UTAE, experts' evaluations over the teaching quality of universities are often imprecise and fuzzy due to the subjective nature of human thinking. In this paper, we propose a new UTAE approach based onq-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and the multiattribute border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method for evaluating and selecting the best university for benchmarking. The introduced method deals with the linguistic assessments given by experts by usingq-ROFSs, assigns the weights of audit elements based on the indifference threshold-based attribute ratio analysis method, and acquires the ranking of universities with an extended MABAC method. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposedq-rung orthopair fuzzy MABAC method is demonstrated through a realistic UTAE example. Results show that the UTAE method being proposed is valid and practical for UTAE.
引用
收藏
页码:1912 / 1933
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[2]   A generalized type-2 fuzzy granular approach with applications to aerospace [J].
Castillo, Oscar ;
Cervantes, Leticia ;
Soria, Jose ;
Sanchez, Mauricio ;
Castro, Juan R. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 354 :165-177
[3]   A comparative study of type-1 fuzzy logic systems, interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems and generalized type-2 fuzzy logic systems in control problems [J].
Castillo, Oscar ;
Amador-Angulo, Leticia ;
Castro, Juan R. ;
Garcia-Valdez, Mario .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 354 :257-274
[4]   Type-2 fuzzy logic aggregation of multiple fuzzy controllers for airplane flight control [J].
Cervantes, Leticia ;
Castillo, Oscar .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 324 :247-256
[5]   Non-traditional machining processes selection and evaluation: A rough multi-attributive border approximation area comparison approach [J].
Chakraborty, Shankar ;
Dandge, Shruti Sudhakar ;
Agarwal, Subham .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 139
[6]  
Chang TC, 2016, EURASIA J MATH SCI T, V12, P1243
[7]   Evaluating teaching performance based on fuzzy AHP and comprehensive evaluation approach [J].
Chen, Jeng-Fung ;
Hsieh, Ho-Nien ;
Do, Quang Hung .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 28 :100-108
[8]   Emergency decision making with extended axiomatic design approach under picture fuzzy environment [J].
Ding, Xue-Feng ;
Zhang, Ling ;
Liu, Hu-Chen .
EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2020, 37 (02)
[9]   Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Geometric Aggregation Operators Using Einstein t-Norm and t-Conorm for Multicriteria Decision-Making Process [J].
Garg, Harish .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (06) :597-630
[10]   Multi-central general type-2 fuzzy clustering approach for pattern recognitions [J].
Golsefid, S. Malek Mohamadi ;
Zarandi, M. H. Fazel ;
Turksen, I. B. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 328 :172-188