Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination and the form of the loudness function

被引:79
|
作者
Buus, S
Florentine, M
Poulsen, T
机构
[1] NORTHEASTERN UNIV, COMMUN RES LAB, DEPT SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOL & AUDIOL 133FR, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[2] TECH UNIV DENMARK, DEPT ACOUST TECHNOL, BLDG 352, DK-2800 LYNGBY, DENMARK
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.417959
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Temporal integration for loudness of 5-kHz tones was measured as a function of level between 2 and 60 dB SL. Absolute thresholds and levels required to produce equal loudness were measured for 2-, 10-, 50-, and 250-ms tones using adaptive, two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice procedures. The procedure for loudness balances was new and employed ten interleaved tracks to obtain concurrent measurements for ten tone pairs. Each track converged at the level required to make the variable stimulus just louder than the fixed stimulus. Thus, the data yield estimates of the just-noticeable difference (jnd) for loudness level and temporal integration for loudness. Results for four listeners show that the amount of temporal integration, defined as the level difference between equally loud short and long tones, varies markedly with level and is largest at moderate levels. The effect of level increases as the duration of the short stimulus decreases and is largest for comparisons between the 2- and 250-ms tones. The loudness-level jnds are also largest at moderate levels and, contrary to traditional jnds for the level of two equal-duration tones, they do not appear to depend on duration. The latter finding indicates that loudness discrimination between stimuli that differ along multiple dimensions is not the same as level discrimination between stimuli that differ only in level. An equal-loudness-ratio model, which assumes that the ratio of loudnesses for a long and short tone at equal SPL is the same at all SPLs, can explain the level dependence of temporal integration and the loudness jnds, It indicates that the loudness function [log(loudness) versus SPL] is flatter at moderate levels than at low and high levels in agreement with earlier findings for 1-kHz tones. (C) 1997 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 680
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LOUDNESS AND LOUDNESS DISCRIMINATION
    PARKER, S
    SCHNEIDER, B
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 28 (05): : 398 - 406
  • [2] Temporal integration of loudness as a function of level
    Florentine, M
    Buus, S
    Poulsen, T
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 99 (03): : 1633 - 1644
  • [3] Modeling Temporal Integration of Loudness
    Hots, Jan
    Rennies, Jan
    Verhey, Jesko L.
    ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA, 2014, 100 (01) : 184 - 187
  • [4] LOUDNESS DISCRIMINATION
    RAWNSLEY, AI
    HARRIS, JD
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1955, 27 (05): : 1008 - 1008
  • [5] CONCERNING THE FORM OF THE LOUDNESS FUNCTION
    STEVENS, SS
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1957, 29 (05): : 603 - 606
  • [6] LOUDNESS DISCRIMINATION
    HARRIS, JD
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1963, 28 (04): : 1 - 63
  • [7] Temporal integration of loudness measured using categorical loudness scaling and matching procedures
    Valente, Daniel L.
    Joshi, Suyash N.
    Jesteadt, Walt
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2011, 130 (01): : EL32 - EL37
  • [8] LAW FOR LOUDNESS DISCRIMINATION
    STEWART, JL
    SCIENCE, 1962, 137 (3530) : 618 - &
  • [9] DISCRIMINATION OF LOUDNESS SIMILARITY
    BECK, J
    SHAW, WA
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1968, 3 (2A): : 105 - &
  • [10] LOUDNESS AND LOUDNESS LEVEL
    SACERDOTE, GG
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1958, 30 (12): : 1165 - 1166