Agri-environmental policies for biodiversity when the spatial pattern of the reserve matters

被引：31

作者：

Bamiere, Laure ^{[1
]}

David, Maia ^{[1
]}

Vermont, Bruno ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] INRA AgroParisTech, UMR Econ Publ, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France

[2] CNRS INRA, GREMAQ, Toulouse, France

来源：

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS | 2013年 / 85卷

关键词：

Agri-environmental policies; Biodiversity; Spatial pattern; Mathematical programming; Auction schemes; Agglomeration bonus/malus; CONSERVATION CONTRACTS; COMPENSATION PAYMENTS; FARMLAND BIRDS; AUCTIONS; DESIGN; HABITAT; AGRICULTURE; INCENTIVES; MANAGEMENT; SCALE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.004

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

The aim of this paper is to compare different environmental policies for cost-effective habitat conservation on agricultural lands, when the desired spatial pattern of reserves is a random mosaic. We use a spatially explicit mathematical programming model which studies the farmers' behavior as profit maximizers under technical and administrative constraints. Facing different policy measures, each farmer chooses the land-use on each field, which determines the landscape at the regional level. A spatial pattern index (Ripley L function) is then associated to the obtained landscape, indicating on the degree of dispersion of the reserve. We compare a subsidy per hectare of reserve with an auction scheme and an agglomeration malus. We find that the auction is superior to the uniform subsidy for cost-efficiency. The agglomeration malus does better than the auction for the spatial pattern but is more costly. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：97 / 104

页数：8

共 53 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1991, Game Theory

[2]

[Anonymous], 2005, AUCTIONS CONSERVATIO

[3] Farming system modelling for agri-environmental policy design: The case of a spatially non-aggregated allocation of conservation measures [J].

Bamiere, Laure ;

Havlik, Petr ;

Jacquet, Florence ;

Lherm, Michel ;

Millet, Guy ;

Bretagnolle, Vincent .

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (05) :891-899

[4] Biological conservation in dynamic agricultural landscapes: Effectiveness of public policies and trade-offs with agricultural production [J].

Barraquand, F. ;

Martinet, V. .

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (05) :910-920

[5] Modelling population reinforcement at a large spatial scale as a conservation strategy for the declining little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) in agricultural habitats [J].

Bretagnolle, V ;

Inchausti, P .

ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 8 :59-68

[6]

Bretagnolle V., 2009, IBIS

[7]

Cason T. N., 2004, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, V86, P1211, DOI 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00666.x

[8] Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales [J].

Chamberlain, DE ;

Fuller, RJ ;

Bunce, RGH ;

Duckworth, JC ;

Shrubb, M .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2000, 37 (05) :771-788

[9] A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes [J].

Drechsler, Martin ;

Waetzold, Frank ;

Johst, Karin ;

Bergmann, Holger ;

Settele, Josef .

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 140 (1-2) :174-186

[10] An agglomeration payment for cost-effective biodiversity conservation in spatially structured landscapes [J].

Drechsler, Martin ;

Waetzold, Frank ;

Johst, Karin ;

Shogren, Jason F. .

RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (02) :261-275

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →