Risk assessment methodology for onboard hydrogen storage

被引：82

作者：

Dadashzadeh, Mohammad ^{[1
]}

Kashkarov, Sergii ^{[1
]}

Makarov, Dmitriy ^{[1
]}

Molkov, Vladimir ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Ulster Univ, Hydrogen Safety Engn & Res Ctr HySAFER, Newtownabbey BT37 0QB, North Ireland

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY | 2018年 / 43卷 / 12期

基金：

英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;

关键词：

Hydrogen safety; Quantitative risk assessment; Onboard hydrogen storage; Blast wave and fireball; Fire resistance rating; Socio-economics; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; REFUELING STATIONS; SAFETY; FIRE; SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.195

中图分类号：

O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];

学科分类号：

070304 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

A quantitative risk assessment of onboard hydrogen-powered vehicle storage, exposed to a fire, is performed. The risk is defined twofold as a cost of human life per vehicle fire, and annual fatality rate per vehicle. The increase of fire resistance rating of the storage tank is demonstrated to drastically reduce the risk to acceptable level. Hazard distances are calculated by validated engineering tools for blast wave and fireball, which follow catastrophic tank rupture in a fire, act in all directions and have larger hazard distances compared to jet fire. The fatality cash value, probabilities of vehicle fire and failure of thermally activated pressure relief device are taken from published sources. A vulnerability probit function is employed to calculate probability of emergency operations' failure to control fire and prevent tank rupture. The risk is presented as a function of fire resistance rating of onboard storage. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：6462 / 6475

页数：14

共 58 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2015, NFPA 2 HYDR TECHN CO

[2]

[Anonymous], 2005, 55 NFPA

[3]

[Anonymous], 2015, 197WG24 ISOTC

[4]

Assael M.J., 2010, Fires, explosions, and toxic gas dispersions: effects calculation and risk analysis