Environmental-economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques

被引:104
作者
Tiwari, DN
Loof, R
Paudyal, GN
机构
[1] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Bangkok 10501, Thailand
[2] Danish Hydraul Inst, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
economic sustainability; economic incentives; environmental-economic decision making; environmental sustainability; multi-criteria analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The continuing debate on sustainability has raised wide concerns towards integration of environmental and eco; nomic aspects into the development decision-making process. This paper develops a framework for environmental-economic decision making that includes the environmental and economic sustainability criteria, and local people's preferences in the context of a lowland irrigated agriculture system using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Several criteria, such as land capability/suitability, energy input/output ratio, water demand and environmental costs, are considered as environmental sustainability criteria. Economic sustainability is measured from farmers': governments and societal viewpoints using extended cost-benefit analysis. The Geographic Information System (GIS) technique has been used to evaluate spatial sustainability criteria. The involvement of local people at various levels of the decision- making process is emphasized and their opinions are sought in the decision-making process using a two-stage field survey. The results of the multi-criteria analysis combining both environmental and economic sustainability criteria are discussed, and economic incentives for sustainable intensification of lowland irrigated agriculture are outlined. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 112
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Application of the analytic hierarchy process in agriculture in developing countries [J].
Alphonce, CB .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1997, 53 (01) :97-112
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, ENV DEV EC APPROACH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[4]   ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS [J].
BARBIER, EB ;
MARKANDYA, A ;
PEARCE, DW .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1990, 22 (09) :1259-1266
[5]  
*FAO, 1991, FAO DENB C REP FOOD
[6]  
Golden B.L., 1989, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE, P37, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6_3, 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6_3.]
[7]  
HAFKAMP W, 1968, J POLICY MODEL, V8, P551
[8]  
HIPPEL KH, 1992, WATER RESOURCES B, V28, P3
[9]  
Janssen R, 1991, MULTIOBJECTIVE DECIS
[10]  
LAXMINARAYANAN PG, 1995, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V45, P365