ANALYSIS OF RELATED FACTORS OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY IN THE TREATMENT OF URINARY CALCULUS

被引:0
作者
Guan, Weimin [1 ]
Liu, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Qiqihaer Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy, Qiqihaer City 161000, Peoples R China
来源
ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA | 2019年 / 35卷
关键词
Extracorporeal shock wave; urinary calculus; influencing factors; clinical medical; STONES;
D O I
10.19193/0393-6384_2019_1s_79
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To study the influencing factors of extracorporeal shock lithotripsy wave (ESWL) in the treatment of urinary calculus and provide reference for the clinical practice of treating urinary calculus. Method: In the The No. 3 Affilated Hospital of Qiqihaer Medical University, 800 patients who had had urinary stones from January 2017 to February 2018 were randomly selected for follow-up investigation. Disease information and preoperative preparation information for each patient are collated. Images of the patient's physical condition are recorded and saved. The postoperative follow-up, data, and clinical symptoms or complications were analyzed. All patients were followed up 1 week after surgery and the follow-up was generally continued for 3 months. Successful treatment: calculus is completely discharged or residual stones <= 3mm, and hydronephrosis is light. Failure treatment: calculus is not discharged or residual stone>3mm, hydronephrosis is not alleviated or aggravated. Statistical factors were used to analyze the factors affecting the effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on urinary calculus. Result: All patients who underwent treatment were followed up for 3 months and the data were summarized. Based on the therapeutic effect, the patients were divided into a failure group and a success group. The complete discharge of calculus or residual calculus <= 3mm belongs to the successful group. The calculus texture is hard, so the broken calculus or the small calculus after the crush is still large, and it is not discharged smoothly. However, in general, a partial calculus diameter > 3 mm is called a treatment failure. The X2 test was used to compare the data of the two groups of patients. Conclusion: The type of lithotripter, the age of the patient, the location of the calculus, BMI, the degree of hydronephrosis, the approach of the source of the shock, the frequency of the shock wave, and the energy during the lithotripsy are all factors that influence the therapeutic effect of the extracorporeal shock wave.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 514
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] The efficacy of a range of contact media as coupling agents in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
    Cartledge, JJ
    Cross, WR
    Lloyd, SN
    Joyce, AD
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (04) : 321 - 324
  • [2] Effect of shock wave number on renal oxidative stress and inflammation
    Clark, Daniel L.
    Connors, Bret A.
    Evan, Andrew P.
    Handa, Rajash K.
    Gao, Sujuan
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (02) : 318 - 322
  • [3] Dellabella M, 2013, JUROL, P2202
  • [4] Devlies W, 2017, J ENDOUROLOGY, V31
  • [5] Guibin XU., 2014, UROL RES, V40, P745
  • [6] Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Chinese Patients With Pancreatic Stones A Prospective Study of 214 Cases
    Hu, Liang-Hao
    Ye, Bo
    Yang, Yu-Guang
    Ji, Jun-Tao
    Zou, Wen-Bin
    Du, Ting-Ting
    Hao, Jun-Feng
    Jiang, Ying-Yi
    Liao, Zhuan
    Li, Zhao-Shen
    [J]. PANCREAS, 2016, 45 (02) : 298 - 305
  • [7] Jackman SV, 2015, WORD JUROL, V16, P371
  • [8] Jakobsson J, 2017, SCAND J UROL, P1
  • [9] Comparison Between Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Treating Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Meta-analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Knudsen, Bodo E.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (04) : 756 - 756
  • [10] Kramheck AE, 2014, J UROLOGY, V7, P164