The influence of total knee arthroplasty geometry on mid-flexion stability: An experimental and finite element study

被引:93
作者
Clary, Chadd W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fitzpatrick, Clare K. [1 ]
Maletsky, Lorin P. [2 ]
Rullkoetter, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Denver, Computat Biomech Lab, Denver, CO USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Mech Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] DePuy Orthoped, Warsaw, IN USA
关键词
Total knee replacement; Kinematics; Knee simulation; Condylar geometry; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; REPLACEMENT MECHANICS; FIXED-BEARING; KINEMATICS; DESIGN; SIMULATION; MOTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.01.025
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Fluoroscopic evaluation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has reported sudden anterior translation of the femur relative to the tibia (paradoxical anterior motion) for some cruciate-retaining designs. This motion may be tied to abrupt changes in the femoral sagittal radius of curvature characteristic of traditional TKA designs, as the geometry transitions from a large load-bearing distal radius to a smaller posterior radius which can accommodate femoral rollback. It was hypothesized that a gradually reducing radius may attenuate sudden changes in anterior posterior motion that occur in mid-flexion with traditional discrete-radius designs. A combined experimental and computational approach was employed to test this hypothesis. A previously developed finite element (FE) model of the Kansas knee simulator (KKS), virtually implanted with multiple implant designs, was used to predict the amount of paradoxical anterior femoral slide during a simulated deep knee bend. The model predicted kinematics demonstrated that incorporating a gradually reducing radius in mid-flexion reduced the magnitude of paradoxical anterior translation between 21% and 68%, depending on the conformity of the tibial insert. Subsequently, both a dual-radius design and a modified design incorporating gradually reducing radii were tested in vitro in the KKS for verification. The model-predicted and experimentally observed kinematics exhibited good agreement, while the average experimental kinematics demonstrated an 81% reduction in anterior translation with the modified design. The FE model demonstrated sufficient sensitivity to appropriately differentiate kinematic changes due to subtle changes in implant design, and served as a useful pre-clinical design-phase tool to improve implant kinematics. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1351 / 1357
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments [J].
Amis, AA ;
Gupte, CM ;
Bull, AMJ ;
Edwards, A .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (03) :257-263
[2]   Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics [J].
Baldwin, Mark A. ;
Clary, Chadd W. ;
Fitzpatrick, Clare K. ;
Deacy, James S. ;
Maletsky, Lorin P. ;
Rullkoetter, Paul J. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 45 (03) :474-483
[3]   Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties [J].
Banks, S ;
Bellemans, J ;
Nozaki, H ;
Whiteside, LA ;
Harman, M ;
Hodge, WA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (410) :131-138
[4]   2003 Hap Paul Award paper of the international society for technology in arthroplasty [J].
Banks, SA ;
Hodge, WA .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (07) :809-816
[5]   Implant design affects knee arthroplasty kinematics during stair-stepping [J].
Banks, SA ;
Hodge, WA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (426) :187-193
[6]   Making sense of knee arthroplasty kinematics: News you can use [J].
Banks, SA ;
Harman, MK ;
Bellemans, J ;
Hodge, WA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A :64-72
[7]  
BLUNN GW, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P253
[8]  
Delport HP, 2006, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V88B, P1016, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8
[9]  
Dennis DA, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P47
[10]   Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty [J].
Dennis, DA ;
Komistek, RD ;
Mahfouz, MR ;
Haas, BD ;
Stiehl, JB .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (416) :37-57