Learning A Spatial Ensemble of Classifiers for Raster Classification: A Summary of Results

被引:4
作者
Jiang, Zhe [1 ]
Shekhar, Shashi [1 ]
Kamzin, Azamat [1 ]
Knight, Joseph [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, St Paul, MN USA
来源
2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOP (ICDMW) | 2014年
关键词
spatial ensemble; raster classification; class ambiguity; spatial heterogeneity; remote sensing;
D O I
10.1109/ICDMW.2014.166
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Given a spatial raster framework F, a set of explanatory feature maps, training and test samples with class labels on F, as well as a base classifier type, the problem of ensemble learning in raster classification aims to learn a collection of base classifiers to minimize classification errors. The problem has important societal applications such as land cover classification but is challenging due to existence of class ambiguity from spatial heterogeneity, i.e., samples with the same feature values may have distinct class labels in different areas. Many existing approaches are non-spatial ensembles (e.g., bagging, boosting, random forest), which assume that learning samples follow an identical distribution. Some spatial ensemble approaches also exist, which simply partition the raster framework into several regular sub-blocks and combine classification results on each sub-block. However, these existing approaches can not address the class ambiguity issue among pixels. In contrast, this paper proposes a new spatial ensemble approach, which partitions the spatial framework into several spatial footprints to minimize class ambiguity of training samples and then learns a base classifier for each footprint. Experimental evaluations on a real world remote sensing dataset show that the proposed spatial ensemble approach outperforms existing approaches when strong class ambiguity exists.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 18
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Banfield RE, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3541, P196
[2]   Which is the best way to organize/classify images by content? [J].
Bosch, Anna ;
Munoz, Xavier ;
Marti, Robert .
IMAGE AND VISION COMPUTING, 2007, 25 (06) :778-791
[3]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[4]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[5]   Distributed learning with bagging-like performance [J].
Chawla, NV ;
Moore, TE ;
Hall, LO ;
Bowyer, KW ;
Kegelmeyer, WP ;
Springer, C .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2003, 24 (1-3) :455-471
[6]   Influence of Multi-Source and Multi-Temporal Remotely Sensed and Ancillary Data on the Accuracy of Random Forest Classification of Wetlands in Northern Minnesota [J].
Corcoran, Jennifer M. ;
Knight, Joseph F. ;
Gallant, Alisa L. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 5 (07) :3212-3238
[7]  
Deschamps A., 2002, INT GEOSC REM SENS S
[8]  
Dixon PM., 2002, Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, V3, P1796, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118445112.STAT07751
[9]  
Freund Y., 1999, Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, V14, P771
[10]  
HARALICK RM, 1985, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INST, V548, P2