A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job

被引:270
|
作者
Pereira, Tanisha [1 ]
Kennedy, John, V [2 ]
Potgieter, Johan [1 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Auckland 0745, New Zealand
[2] GNS Sci, 1 Fairway Dr, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand
来源
DIGITAL MANUFACTURING TRANSFORMING INDUSTRY TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE GROWTH | 2019年 / 30卷
关键词
Manufacturing; AM vs Traditional Manufacturing; Defects in Manufacturing; Quality Assurance Progression; MASS CUSTOMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Manufacturing industries and investors are always seeking to improve techniques to lower cost, energy and expand their capability. Additive manufacturing, started in the 1960s, has since had a rapid and continuous growth, bringing to light novel techniques to expand manufacturing capability and reinvent the wheel. At this stage, research and industry interest lie in determining where AM can replace or create new manufacturing systems. Traditional manufacturing refers to subtractive and long-established manufacturing methods, quality assured and implemented in the commercial space. This paper reviews the capability of AM and its current development to compete or add to established traditional manufacturing regions. Literature reveals the capability of AM to fit into established manufacturing regions for low and high production volume products. The paper comparison focuses on the similarities, differences, advantages and disadvantages found in AM vs SM studying the economic and quality management status of the industry today. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Design and Additive Technologies for Advanced Manufacturing: Best Practices
    Laudante, Elena
    Giugliano, Giovanna
    Formati, Fabrizio
    MACROMOLECULAR SYMPOSIA, 2021, 396 (01)
  • [22] Comparison of a transtibial socket design obtained by additive manufacturing and reverse engineering and a traditional model
    Jaimes, E. Salamanca
    Prada Botia, G. C.
    Reis, P. H. Rodrigues G.
    Campos Rubio, J. C.
    Volpini Lana, M. R.
    INTERNATIONAL MEETING ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 1126
  • [23] DESIGN OF MECHATRONIC TECHNOLOGICAL COMPLEXES FOR TRADITIONAL AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Kheifetz, Mikhail L.
    DOKLADY NATSIONALNOI AKADEMII NAUK BELARUSI, 2020, 64 (06): : 739 - 746
  • [24] Integrated traditional and additive manufacturing production profitability model
    Nagulpelli, Kimberly S.
    King, Russell E.
    Warsing, Donald
    47TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (NAMRC 47), 2019, 34 : 619 - 630
  • [25] Logistical Aspects of Transition from Traditional to Additive Manufacturing
    Szymczyk, Patrycja
    Smolina, Irina
    Rusinska, Malgorzata
    Wozna, Anna
    Tomassetti, Andrea
    Chlebus, Edward
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING AND MAINTENANCE, 2019, 835 : 752 - 760
  • [26] An Additive Manufacturing method based on xerography
    Tan, Y. E.
    Chua, C. K.
    INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENTS ON VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2012, : 603 - 607
  • [27] A SLICING METHOD FOR SPHERICAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Kim, Christopher D.
    DeVries, Levi D.
    Kutzer, Michael D. M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 3, 2023,
  • [28] ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING: THE FUTURE OF MANUFACTURING
    Adekanye, Sheriff Adefemi
    Mahamood, Rasheedat Modupe
    Akinlabi, Esther Titilayo
    Owolabi, Moses Gbadebo
    MATERIALI IN TEHNOLOGIJE, 2017, 51 (05): : 709 - 715
  • [29] Selection of suitable additive manufacturing machine and materials through best–worst method (BWM)
    Manivel Palanisamy
    Arivazhagan Pugalendhi
    Rajesh Ranganathan
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 107 : 2345 - 2362
  • [30] Prioritizing Competitive Capabilities in Additive Manufacturing Systems Using Best-Worst Method
    Dohale, Vishwas
    Akarte, Milind
    Verma, Priyanka
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 117 - 128