Could two negative emotions be a positive? The effects of anger and anxiety in enemyship

被引:13
作者
Motro, Daphna [1 ]
Sullivan, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Eller Coll Management, McClelland Hall,405G, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Psychol, Psychol Bldg,519, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Control threats; Enemyship; Anger; Anxiety; Motivation; Approach-avoidance; COMPENSATORY CONTROL; WORK MOTIVATION; PERFORMANCE; APPRAISAL; MODEL; RISK; INTELLIGENCE; PERSPECTIVE; UNCERTAINTY; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Enemyship is an important but understudied interpersonal phenomenon. Prior research on this topic has focused on enemyship's cognitive, control-maintenance function following a threat. The present studies advance theory and research by showing the role of emotion, particularly anger, in this process. Using appraisal theory as a framework, we draw on recent research into approach and avoidance motivational dynamics during threat We propose an interaction between anxiety-inducing threat and enemy-directed anger on perceptions of control and certainty, and motivation. More specifically, we expect that when an anxiety-inducing threat is present, perceptions of control and certainty will be significantly higher when enemy-directed anger is also present than when it is not Additionally, we sought to demonstrate the consequences of these processes for motivation. Perhaps counterintuitively, we propose that individuals who experience anger at an enemy following an anxiety-inducing control threat will experience a boost in motivation, an effect mediated by perceptions of control and certainty. We find support for our moderated mediation model across three studies with undergraduate and working adults (Total N = 673). (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 143
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]   Human aggression [J].
Anderson, CA ;
Bushman, BJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 53 :27-51
[4]  
[Anonymous], ANGEL IN ARMOR
[5]  
Averill J., 1982, ANGER AND AGGRESSION
[6]   Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations [J].
Bauer, Daniel J. ;
Preacher, Kristopher J. ;
Gil, Karen M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 11 (02) :142-163
[7]   A DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE ON AFFECT AND CREATIVITY [J].
Bledow, Ronald ;
Rosing, Kathrin ;
Frese, Michael .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 56 (02) :432-450
[8]   Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience [J].
Button, Katherine S. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Mokrysz, Claire ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Flint, Jonathan ;
Robinson, Emma S. J. ;
Munafo, Marcus R. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 14 (05) :365-376
[9]   Anger Is an Approach-Related Affect: Evidence and Implications [J].
Carver, Charles S. ;
Harmon-Jones, Eddie .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2009, 135 (02) :183-204
[10]   EXAMINING THE EFFECTS OF SLEEP DEPRIVATION ON WORKPLACE DEVIANCE: A SELF-REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE [J].
Christian, Michael S. ;
Ellis, Aleksander P. J. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 54 (05) :913-934