Predicting changes in dose distribution to tumor and normal tissue when correcting for heterogeneity in radiotherapy for lung cancer

被引:8
作者
Chang, Daniel [1 ]
Liu, Chihray [1 ]
Dempsey, James F. [1 ]
Palta, Jatinder R. [1 ]
Kopea, Jill [1 ]
Louis, Debbie [1 ]
Morris, Christopher [1 ]
Chopra, Rahul [1 ]
Olivier, Kenneth R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2007年 / 30卷 / 01期
关键词
radiation therapy; lung cancer; heterogeneity correction;
D O I
10.1097/01.coc.0000251222.36417.3b
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purposes: The purposes of this study were to examine dose alterations to gross tumor volume (GTV) and lung using heterogeneity corrections and to predict the magnitude of these changes. Methods: Three separate conformal plans were generated for 37 patients with lung cancer: plan 1 corrected for heterogeneity, plan 2 did not correct for heterogeneity, and plan 3 used identical beams and monitor units from plan 2 but with heterogeneous calculations. Plans 1 and 2 were normalized to the 95% isodose line. Mean dose (MeanD(GTV)), maximum dose (MaxD(GTV)), and minimum dose (MinD(GTV)) to GTV and V-20 were compared between plans 1 and 3. For each patient, the amount of lung in all beam paths of plan 3 was quantified by a density correction factor and correlated with the percent change. Results: The median percent change in MeanD(GTV), MaxD(GTV), and MinD(GTV) between plan 3 and plan 1 was -4.7% (-0.1% to -19.1%, P < 0.0001), -5.59% (0.16% to -31.86%, P < 0.0001), and -4.88% (2.90% to -24.88%, P < 0.0001), respectively. The median V-20 difference was -1% (1% to -8%). The density correction factor correlated with larger differences in MeanD(GTV) on univariate analysis. Conclusions: Heterogeneity correction lowers the dose to GTV by 5%. This difference can be correlated with the density correction factor.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 62
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
American Joint Committee on Cancer, 2002, AJCC CANC STAG HDB, P215
[2]   A RANDOMIZED PHASE-I/II TRIAL OF HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIATION-THERAPY WITH TOTAL DOSES OF 60.0 GY TO 79.2 GY - POSSIBLE SURVIVAL BENEFIT WITH GREATER-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO 69.6 GY IN FAVORABLE PATIENTS WITH RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP STAGE-III NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CARCINOMA - REPORT OF RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP 83-11 [J].
COX, JD ;
AZARNIA, N ;
BYHARDT, RW ;
SHIN, KH ;
EMAMI, B ;
PAJAK, TF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (09) :1543-1555
[3]   TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION [J].
EMAMI, B ;
LYMAN, J ;
BROWN, A ;
COIA, L ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
SHANK, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
WESSON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :109-122
[4]   The accuracy of CT-based inhomogeneity corrections and in vivo dosimetry for the treatment of lung cancer [J].
Essers, M ;
Lanson, JH ;
Leunens, G ;
Schnabel, T ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (03) :199-208
[5]   Treatment planning for lung cancer: Traditional homogeneous point-dose prescription compared with heterogeneity-corrected dose-volume prescription [J].
Frank, SJ ;
Forster, KM ;
Stevens, CW ;
Cox, JD ;
Komaki, R ;
Liao, ZX ;
Tucker, S ;
Wang, XM ;
Steadham, RE ;
Brooks, C ;
Starkschall, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (05) :1308-1318
[6]  
Gifford Kent A, 2002, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V3, P26, DOI 10.1120/1.1434315
[7]  
HUNT MA, 1997, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V37, P482
[8]   A volumetric study of measurements and calculations of lung density corrections for 6 and 18 MV photons [J].
Klein, EE ;
Morrison, A ;
Purdy, JA ;
Graham, MV ;
Matthews, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (05) :1163-1170
[9]  
Mackie TR, 1996, TELETHERAPY PRESENT, P103
[10]   ON THE IMPACT OF TISSUE INHOMOGENEITY CORRECTIONS IN CLINICAL THORACIC RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
MAH, K ;
VANDYK, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (05) :1257-1267