Learning Capability, Technological Parity, and Innovation Mode Use

被引:55
|
作者
Hull, Clyde Eirikur [1 ]
Covin, Jeffrey G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rochester Inst Technol, Saunders Sch Business, Saunders Coll Business, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; FIRM RESOURCES; PRODUCT; COLLABORATION; MARKET; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ACQUISITIONS; DETERMINANTS; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00702.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research was to examine whether a firm's learning capability interacts with industry technological parity to predict innovation mode use. Learning capability is conceptualized in the current research as a firm's ability to develop or acquire the new knowledge-based resources and skills needed to offer new products. Industry technological parity is conceptualized as the extent to which similarity and equality exist among the technological competencies of the firms in an industry. Three generic modes of innovation are considered: internal, cooperative, and external innovation. These modes reflect the development of new products based solely on internal resources, the collaborative development of new products (i.e., with one or more development partners), and the acquisition of fully developed products from external sources, respectively. The premises of this research are that (1) technological parity can create incentives or disincentives for innovating in a particular mode, depending upon the value of external innovative resources relative to the value of internal innovative resources and (2) firms will choose innovation modes that reflect a combination of their abilities and incentives to innovate alone, with others, or through others. Survey research and secondary sources were used to collect data from 119 high-technology firms. Results indicate that firms exhibit greater use of internal and external innovation when high levels of industry technological parity are matched by high levels of firm learning capability. By contrast, a negative relationship between learning capability and industry technological parity is associated with greater use of the cooperative mode of innovation. Thus, a single, common internal capability-learning capability-interacts with the level of technological parity in the environment to significantly predict three distinct innovation modes-modes that are not inherently dependent upon one another. As such, a firm's internal ability to innovate, as reflected in learning capability, has relevance well beyond that firm's likely internal innovation output. It also predicts the firm's likely use of cooperative and external innovation when considered in light of the level of industry technological parity. A practical implication of these findings is that companies with modest learning capabilities are not inherently precluded from innovating. Rather, they can innovate through modes for which conditions in their current environments do not constitute significant obstacles to innovation output. In particular, modest learning capabilities are associated with higher innovative output in the internal, cooperative, and external modes when industry technological parity levels are low, high, and low, respectively. Conversely, strong learning capabilities tend to be associated with higher innovative output in the internal, cooperative, and external modes when industry technological parity levels are high, low, and high, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 114
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The theory and empirical study of regional technological innovation capability
    Bei Wu
    Zengyuan Wu
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2006, : 453 - +
  • [32] EMPIRICAL STUDY OF NATIONAL TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION CAPABILITY IN AFRICA
    Garcia-Ochoa Mayor, Monica
    Blazquez de la Hera, Mara Luisa
    de Diego Ruiz, Enrique
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2012, 15 (04): : 440 - 463
  • [33] Study on the evaluation of technological innovation capability under uncertainty
    Kong, Feng
    Zhang, Zhiguang
    Liu, Ying
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 12868 - 12871
  • [34] Technological capability and business success: The mediating role of innovation
    Lestari, E. R.
    Ardianti, F. L.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2018 (ICSARD 2018), 2019, 250
  • [35] Analysis on Technological Innovation Capability of Industrial Robot Industry
    Chen Wenjing
    Yan Jingdong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 856 - 860
  • [36] Analysis of the Scientific and Technological Innovation Capability of the Food Industry in China Based on the Scientific and Technological Innovation Achievements
    Li X.
    Wang W.
    Zang M.
    Zhang H.
    Bai Y.
    Li J.
    Yuan K.
    Li D.
    Zhang K.
    Zhang Z.
    Shipin Kexue/Food Science, 2022, 43 (15): : 345 - 356
  • [37] The Empirical Analysis of enterprise Scientific and Technological Innovation Capability
    Heng, Tan
    2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 : 1258 - 1263
  • [38] The Role of Organizational Capability in Choosing the Technological Innovation Approaches
    Xu, Rui
    Qin, Qin
    Song, Xiaomin
    Liu, Xanping
    EIGHTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III, 2009, : 2142 - 2147
  • [39] Study on Enterprise Technological Innovation Capability Maturity Model
    Qin Dezhi
    Hu Hong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 693 - 697
  • [40] Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty
    Wang, Chun-hsien
    Lu, Iuan-yuan
    Chen, Chie-bein
    TECHNOVATION, 2008, 28 (06) : 349 - 363