Learning Capability, Technological Parity, and Innovation Mode Use

被引:55
|
作者
Hull, Clyde Eirikur [1 ]
Covin, Jeffrey G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rochester Inst Technol, Saunders Sch Business, Saunders Coll Business, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; FIRM RESOURCES; PRODUCT; COLLABORATION; MARKET; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ACQUISITIONS; DETERMINANTS; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00702.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research was to examine whether a firm's learning capability interacts with industry technological parity to predict innovation mode use. Learning capability is conceptualized in the current research as a firm's ability to develop or acquire the new knowledge-based resources and skills needed to offer new products. Industry technological parity is conceptualized as the extent to which similarity and equality exist among the technological competencies of the firms in an industry. Three generic modes of innovation are considered: internal, cooperative, and external innovation. These modes reflect the development of new products based solely on internal resources, the collaborative development of new products (i.e., with one or more development partners), and the acquisition of fully developed products from external sources, respectively. The premises of this research are that (1) technological parity can create incentives or disincentives for innovating in a particular mode, depending upon the value of external innovative resources relative to the value of internal innovative resources and (2) firms will choose innovation modes that reflect a combination of their abilities and incentives to innovate alone, with others, or through others. Survey research and secondary sources were used to collect data from 119 high-technology firms. Results indicate that firms exhibit greater use of internal and external innovation when high levels of industry technological parity are matched by high levels of firm learning capability. By contrast, a negative relationship between learning capability and industry technological parity is associated with greater use of the cooperative mode of innovation. Thus, a single, common internal capability-learning capability-interacts with the level of technological parity in the environment to significantly predict three distinct innovation modes-modes that are not inherently dependent upon one another. As such, a firm's internal ability to innovate, as reflected in learning capability, has relevance well beyond that firm's likely internal innovation output. It also predicts the firm's likely use of cooperative and external innovation when considered in light of the level of industry technological parity. A practical implication of these findings is that companies with modest learning capabilities are not inherently precluded from innovating. Rather, they can innovate through modes for which conditions in their current environments do not constitute significant obstacles to innovation output. In particular, modest learning capabilities are associated with higher innovative output in the internal, cooperative, and external modes when industry technological parity levels are low, high, and low, respectively. Conversely, strong learning capabilities tend to be associated with higher innovative output in the internal, cooperative, and external modes when industry technological parity levels are high, low, and high, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 114
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effects of Technology Management Capability versus Technological Capability on Product Innovation
    Liu Ye-xin
    Wu Wei-wei
    Zhang Qi
    Zhang Huan-di
    Schaub, Dominik
    2016 23RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS. I AND II, 2016, : 661 - 667
  • [22] Research on technological innovation mode of SMEs
    Guan Hailing
    Zhou Yin
    Advances in Management of Technology, Proceedings, 2006, : 165 - 170
  • [23] Technological capability, relational capability and firms' performance: The role of learning capability
    Salisu, Yakubu
    Abu Bakar, Lily Julienti
    REGE-REVISTA DE GESTAO, 2020, 27 (01): : 79 - 99
  • [24] Designing a Tool for Assessing and Developing Technological Innovation Capability Using the Concept of Innovation Capability Maturity Model
    Tachaboon, Nattida
    WITH DESIGN: REINVENTING DESIGN MODES, IASDR 2021, 2022, : 3418 - 3425
  • [25] The research on evaluation of technological innovation capability based on ANP
    Zhang, Huimin
    Zhou, Bin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING - MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES SECTION, 2007, : 328 - 332
  • [26] Comparison analysis on technological innovation capability of MLE in China
    Lu Fangyuan
    Jiao Keyan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION & MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2007, : 138 - 142
  • [27] TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION, CAPABILITY POSITIONAL SHIFTS, AND SYSTEMIC WAR
    RASLER, K
    THOMPSON, WR
    JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1991, 35 (03) : 412 - 442
  • [28] Thoughts about University to Promote Technological Innovation Capability
    Jun, Jiang
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE (ICASS 2011), VOL V, 2011, : 541 - 544
  • [29] Construction of Evaluation Model of Enterprises Technological Innovation Capability
    Zhang Jingmin
    Lu Yanqiu
    Wang Huijun
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING: ENTERPRISE, ENVIRONMENT AND CRISIS, 2009, : 749 - 757
  • [30] Pathways for the improvement of indigenous technological innovation capability in China
    Chen, J
    Xu, QR
    INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT - THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP, 1997, : 179 - 182