Accommodation modulates the individual difference between objective and subjective measures of the final convergence step response

被引:11
作者
Jainta, S. [1 ]
Hoormann, J. [1 ]
Jaschinski, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dortmund, Inst Arbeitsphysiol, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany
关键词
disparity; nonius lines; step response; vergence eye movements; FIXATION DISPARITY; VERGENCE; FUSION; ADAPTATION; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00624.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Measuring vergence eye movements with dichoptic nonius lines (subjectively) usually leads to an overestimation of the vergence state after a step response: a subjective vergence overestimation (SVO). We tried to reduce this SVO by presenting a vergence stimulus that decoupled vergence and accommodation during the step response, i.e. reduced the degree of 'forced vergence'. In a mirror-stereoscope, we estimated convergence step responses with nonius lines presented at 1000 ms after a disparity step-stimulus and compared it to objective recordings (EyeLink II; n = 6). We presented a vertical line, a cross/rectangle stimulus and a difference-of-gaussians (DOG) pattern. For 180 min arc step stimuli, the subjective measures revealed a larger final vergence response than the objective measure; for the vertical line this SVO was 20 min arc, while it was significantly smaller for the DOG (12 min arc). For 60 min arc step-responses, no overestimation was observed. Additionally, we measured accommodation, which changed more for the DOG-pattern compared with the line-stimulus; this relative increase correlated with the corresponding relative change of SVO (r = 0.77). Both findings (i.e. no overestimation for small steps and a weaker one for the DOG-pattern) reflect lesser conflicting demand on accommodation and vergence under 'forced-vergence' viewing; consequently, sensory compensation is reduced and subjective and objective measures of vergence step responses tend to agree.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 172
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Short-term predictive changes in the dynamics of disparity vergence eye movements [J].
Alvarez, TL ;
Bhavsar, M ;
Semmlow, JL ;
Bergen, MT ;
Pedrono, C .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2005, 5 (07) :640-649
[2]  
CARTER D B, 1958, Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom, V35, P590
[3]   Capture of visual direction: An unexpected phenomenon in binocular vision [J].
Erkelens, CJ ;
vanEe, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 1997, 37 (09) :1193-1196
[4]   ADAPTATION OF OCULAR VERGENCE TO STIMULATION WITH LARGE DISPARITIES [J].
ERKELENS, CJ .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (03) :507-516
[5]  
Evans BJ., 2002, PICKWELLS BINOCULAR, Vfourth
[6]   Comparison of the monocular occlusion and a direct method for objective measurement of fixation disparity [J].
Fogt, N ;
Jones, R .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (01) :43-50
[7]   Comparison of fixation disparities obtained by objective and subjective methods [J].
Fogt, N ;
Jones, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 1998, 38 (03) :411-421
[8]   The effect of forced vergence on retinal correspondence [J].
Fogt, N ;
Jones, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 1998, 38 (18) :2711-2719
[9]   The relative sensitivities of sensory and motor fusion to small binocular disparities [J].
Fredenburg, P ;
Harwerth, RS .
VISION RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (15) :1969-1979
[10]  
HOORMANN J, 2008, J EYE MOVEMENT RES, V1, P1