Low rectal cancer: Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes

被引:28
|
作者
Dimitriou, Nikoletta [1 ]
Michail, Othon [1 ]
Moris, Dimitrios [1 ]
Griniatsos, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Dept Surg 1, Med Sch, Laiko Hosp, 17 Agiou Thoma St, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
Low rectal cancer; Sphincter preserving surgery; Intersphincteric resection; Anterior Perineal; PlanE for Ultra-low Anterior Resection of the Rectum; Total mesorectal excision; TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery; Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision; Quality of life; Oncological outcome; Functional outcome; TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; DIRECT COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION; LOCAL EXCISION; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN;
D O I
10.4251/wjgo.v7.i7.55
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Low rectal cancer is traditionally treated by abdominoperineal resection. In recent years, several new techniques for the treatment of very low rectal cancer patients aiming to preserve the gastrointestinal continuity and to improve both the oncological as well as the functional outcomes, have been emerged. Literature suggest that when the intersphincteric resection is applied in T1-3 tumors located within 30-35 mm from the anal verge, is technically feasible, safe, with equal oncological outcomes compared to conventional surgery and acceptable quality of life. The Anterior Perineal PlanE for Ultra-low Anterior Resection technique, is not disrupting the sphincters, but carries a high complication rate, while the reports on the oncological and functional outcomes are limited. Transanal Endoscopic MicroSurgery (TEM) and TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) should represent the treatment of choice for T1 rectal tumors, with specific criteria according to the NCCN guidelines and favorable pathologic features. Alternatively to the standard conventional surgery, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy followed by TEM or TAMIS seems promising for tumors of a local stage T1sm2-3 or T2. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision should be performed only when a board approved protocol is available by colorectal surgeons with extensive experience in minimally invasive and transanal endoscopic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 70
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision combined with sphincter-preserving surgery in low or ultralow rectal cancer
    Liu, Yan
    Lu, Xiao-Ming
    Niu, Yan-Feng
    Tao, Kai-Xiong
    Wang, Guo-Bin
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE OPTICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 9 (05)
  • [22] Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Patients With Low Sphincter-Preserving Operations Compared to Patients With Abdominoperineal Resection
    Park, In Ja
    CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS, 2018, 14 (03) : 81 - 88
  • [23] Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer in the Twenty-First Century: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    Albutt, Katherine
    Wise, Paul E.
    Alavi, Karim
    Sudan, Ranjan
    Kaiser, Andreas M.
    Bordeianou, Liliana
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (08) : 1477 - 1487
  • [24] Clinical parameters predictive for sphincter-preserving surgery and prognostic outcome in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer
    Partl, Richard
    Magyar, Marton
    Hassler, Eva
    Langsenlehner, Tanja
    Kapp, Karin Sigrid
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [25] Conformal proctectomy with sphincter preservation retains acceptable defecation functions in very low rectal cancer male patients
    Chen, Weijie
    Zhang, Xiao
    Qiu, Xiaoyuan
    Zhou, Jiaolin
    Lin, Guole
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [26] Comparison between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sphincter-preserving operations for ultra-low rectal cancer
    Kojima, Tadahiro
    Hino, Hitoshi
    Shiomi, Akio
    Kagawa, Hiroyasu
    Yamaoka, Yusuke
    Manabe, Shoichi
    Kato, Shunichiro
    Hanaoka, Marie
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2022, 6 (05): : 643 - 650
  • [27] Optimizing the selection of patients with low rectal cancer for intersphincteric resection by evaluating vertical invasion to the levator and external sphincter
    Narui, K.
    Ichikawa, Y.
    Ike, H.
    Ota, M.
    Saito, S.
    Fujii, S.
    Sasaki, T.
    Nozawa, A.
    Shimada, H.
    Endo, I.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [28] Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancers: Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Stoma
    Mak, Joanna Chung Kiu
    Foo, Dominic Chi Chung
    Wei, Rockson
    Law, Wai Lun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 41 (11) : 2912 - 2922
  • [29] Quality of life after laparoscopic vs open sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer
    Ng, Simon Siu-Man
    Leung, Wing-Wa
    Wong, Cherry Yee-Ni
    Hon, Sophie Sok-Fei
    Mak, Tony Wing-Chung
    Ngo, Dennis Kwok-Yu
    Lee, Janet Fung-Yee
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (29) : 4764 - 4773
  • [30] Open versus robot-assisted sphincter-saving operations in rectal cancer patients: techniques and comparison of outcomes between groups of 100 matched patients
    Kim, Jin C.
    Yang, Sung S.
    Jang, Tae Y.
    Kwak, Jae Y.
    Yun, Myung J.
    Lim, Seok B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2012, 8 (04) : 468 - 475