1995 survey of physics teaching efforts in radiation oncology residency programs

被引:6
作者
Klein, EE
Gerbi, B
Meli, J
Marsden, D
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA,MINNEAPOLIS,MN
[2] ST VINCENTS MED CTR,BRIDGEPORT,CT
[3] ST LUKES ROOSEVELT HOSP,NEW YORK,NY 10025
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1997年 / 38卷 / 02期
关键词
radiation oncology; teaching; physics; survey;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(97)82502-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A physics teaching survey was constructed and sent to the 83 radiation oncologist training programs, The survey requested program information regarding size, staffing, curriculum, lab/rotation programs, organization, requirements, instructor makeup, teaching materials, and board certification examination results, The surveys were sent to the physicist responsible for the physics program, Forty-nine (59%) institutions returned completed surveys, of which 43 (88%) were university-associated programs, and 27 (55%) were 4-year programs, On average, there were two residents/year. Most programs (39) taught physics exclusively during the first year (PG2). Some programs taught different subjects (or levels) to different year residents, Radiation dosimetry, treatment planning, and brachytherapy constituted nearly half of the teaching hours, On average the total classroom time expended by physicists was 61.4 h/year with a range of 24-118 h. The mean for laboratory/demonstration time was 27 h/year with 18 programs providing none. Physics orientation/rotations ranged from 1 to 480 h with a mean of 170 h for a physics rotation taking place in year 2 (PG3). Mandatory attendance was 80% for first-year residents and decreased in later years, Homework was assigned in 76% of the programs, and 65% of the programs were graded. The primary instructors averaged 18.2 years of experience, and the majority were ABR/ABMP certified, Khan's textbook was the most prevalent resource for most subjects, No correlation could be made between teaching hours and ABR physics percentile scoring, The survey results reveal enormous differences in national teaching efforts. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 446
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], TREATMENT PLANNING D
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1992, RAD THERAPY PLANNING
  • [3] ATTIX F. H., 1986, Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry
  • [4] BISHONG SC, 1988, RADIOLOGICAL SCI TEC
  • [5] Training the radiation oncologist for the twenty-first century
    Coleman, CN
    Griffin, TW
    Prosnitz, LR
    Hoppe, RT
    Cooper, JS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (04): : 821 - 826
  • [6] A SURVEY OF RADIATION ONCOLOGISTS REGARDING THEIR RADIATION PHYSICS INSTRUCTION
    DOPPKE, KP
    MORIN, RL
    CHU, W
    GERBI, BG
    GOULD, RG
    HEFNER, LV
    MARSDEN, DS
    PAVLICEK, W
    RITENOUR, ER
    SCHOENFELD, AH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 25 (02): : 345 - 352
  • [7] Hall EJ., 1994, RADIOBIOLOGY RADIOLO
  • [8] HENDEE WR, 1979, MED RAD PHYSICS
  • [9] JOHNS HE, 1983, PHYSICS RADIOLOGY
  • [10] KHAN FM, PHYSICS RAD THERAPY