On normality, ethnicity, and missing values in quantitative trait locus mapping

被引:3
作者
Labbe, A [1 ]
Wormald, H
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Math & Stat, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S52
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: This paper deals with the detection of significant linkage for quantitative traits using a variance components approach. Microsatellite markers were obtained for the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism data. Ethnic heterogeneity, highly skewed quantitative measures, and a high rate of missing values are all present in this dataset and well known to impact upon linkage analysis. This makes it a good candidate for investigation. Results: As expected, we observed a number of changes in LOD scores, especially for chromosomes 1, 7, and 18, along with the three factors studied. A dramatic example of such changes can be found in chromosome 7. Highly significant linkage to one of the quantitative traits became insignificant when a proper normalizing transformation of the trait was used and when analysis was carried out on an ethnically homogeneous subset of the original pedigrees. Conclusion: In agreement with existing literature, transforming a trait to ensure normality using a Box-Cox transformation is highly recommended in order to avoid false-positive linkages. Furthermore, pedigrees should be sorted by ethnic groups and analyses should be carried out separately. Finally, one should be aware that the inclusion of covariates with a high rate of missing values reduces considerably the number of subjects included in the model. In such a case, the loss in power may be large. Imputation methods are then recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure [J].
Allison, DB ;
Neale, MC ;
Zannolli, R ;
Schork, NJ ;
Amos, CI ;
Blangero, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1999, 65 (02) :531-544
[2]   Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees [J].
Almasy, L ;
Blangero, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 62 (05) :1198-1211
[3]  
AMOS CI, 1994, AM J HUM GENET, V54, P535
[4]  
Barnholtz-Sloan Jill S., 2001, Ethnicity and Disease, V11, P519
[5]  
Blangero J, 1997, GENET EPIDEMIOL, V14, P959, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<959::AID-GEPI66>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-K
[7]   Methods for linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci in humans [J].
Feingold, E .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 60 (03) :167-180
[8]   Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models [J].
Fridley, B ;
Rabe, K ;
de Andrade, M .
BMC GENETICS, 2003, 4 (Suppl 1)
[9]   Clustering of pedigrees using marker allele frequencies: Implact on linkage analysis [J].
Grigull, J ;
Alexandrova, R ;
Paterson, AD .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 21 :S61-S66
[10]  
Venable W.N., 2002, MODERN APPL STAT S